Permanent commission in army: SC allows pleas of women officers, says evaluation process is 'discriminatory'

A Bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud said the process by which women officers were evaluated did not address the gender discrimination concern raised in the verdict delivered by the apex court last year

Press Trust of India March 25, 2021 16:43:40 IST
Permanent commission in army: SC allows pleas of women officers, says evaluation process is 'discriminatory'

File image of the Supreme Court of India. PTI

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the pleas of several women SSC officers seeking grant of permanent commission in the Army, while holding that the ACR evaluation process was flawed and discriminatory in nature.

The bench also noted that the "structure of our society is created by males for males where talk of equality is a farce and since Independence, efforts have been made to bridge the gap and grant equal opportunity to men and women".

Delivering its verdict on a batch of pleas filed by several women officers who had sought compliance of its February last year directions to the Centre for grant of permanent commission, promotions and consequential benefits, the court said the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) evaluation criteria for grant of permanent commission to women officers ignored achievements and laurels brought by them to the Indian Army.

A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud said the process by which women officers were evaluated did not address the gender discrimination concern raised in the verdict delivered by the apex court last year.

In its landmark judgement delivered on 17 February last year, the top court had directed that women officers in the Army be granted permanent commission, rejecting the Centre's stand of their physiological limitations as being based on "sex stereotypes" and "gender discrimination against women".

It had directed that within three months, all serving short service commission (SSC) women officers have to be considered for permanent commission irrespective of them having crossed 14 years or, as the case may be, 20 years of service.

In its judgement passed on Thursday, the apex court said that ACR evaluation criteria for SSC women officers in Army created systematic discrimination.

“The ACR evaluation process itself indicated that it was flawed and we hold it to be unfair and arbitrary,” the bench said. "It is not enough to state that women officers are allowed in Army when their service condition show a different picture,” it said.

"Women who have not been granted permanent commission have not come before us for charity, but for their rights," the top court said.

Some of the women officers had said in their plea filed in the apex court that directions passed earlier were not being complied with in "letter and spirit".

The procedures for grant of permanent commission is "vitiated with arbitrariness, unfairness and unreasonableness", they had alleged in the plea.

Updated Date:

also read

‘Serious allegations’: SC rejects plea by Anil Deshmukh, Maharashtra govt against CBI probe
India

‘Serious allegations’: SC rejects plea by Anil Deshmukh, Maharashtra govt against CBI probe

The former home minister had challenged the Bombay HC order directing a CBI probe into allegations of corruption levelled against him by former Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh

PIL in SC seeks direction to Centre and states to stop black magic, forced religious conversions
India

PIL in SC seeks direction to Centre and states to stop black magic, forced religious conversions

The plea filed by advocate and BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay also sought directions to ascertain the feasibility of appointing a committee to enact a legislation on religious conversions

Farm laws: Supreme Court-appointed committee submits report in sealed cover
India

Farm laws: Supreme Court-appointed committee submits report in sealed cover

The SC on 11 January had stayed the implementation of the three laws till further orders and appointed a four-member panel to resolve the impasse. The committee was given two months to study the laws and consult all stakeholders