Arun Jaitley sues Arvind Kejriwal for Rs 10 crore after Delhi CM's lawyer Ram Jethmalani's 'crook' remark

Jaitley, who was being cross-examined, furiously asked Jethmalani whether the word 'crook' used by him was in his personal capacity or as per the instruction of Kejriwal.

FP Staff May 23, 2017 11:03:04 IST
Arun Jaitley sues Arvind Kejriwal for Rs 10 crore after Delhi CM's lawyer Ram Jethmalani's 'crook' remark

Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal may find himself in fresh trouble as Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has filed a fresh Rs 10 crore defamation suit against the Aam Aadmi Party leader over the use of an objectionable word by his counsel Ram Jethmalani on 17 May.

During the court proceedings, Jaitley took strong objections to the word 'crook' used by Jethmalani, while the senior lawyer was cross-examining the union minister in a separate defamation case pertaining to Kejriwal's graft allegation's on Jaitley in an alleged DDCA scam.

Arun Jaitley sues Arvind Kejriwal for Rs 10 crore after Delhi CMs lawyer Ram Jethmalanis crook remark

File photo of Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. PTI

"I intend to show that this man (Jaitley) is a crook," said Jethmalani, prompting strong objection from Jaitley and giving rise to an ugly verbal spat between the once-close legal associates.

Jaitley, who was being cross-examined, furiously asked Jethmalani whether the word "crook" used by him was in his personal capacity or as per the instruction of Kejriwal.

Jaitley had threatened to seek higher damages. "I will aggravate the charges against the defendants (Kejriwal)... There is a limit to personal malice," he said after Jethmalani, appearing for Kejriwal, said he wanted to prove that the union minister was a "crook".

Asked to clarify the source of the word, Jethmalani said it has been used by him on instruction from his client (Kejriwal).

Senior counsels Rajiv Nayyar and Sandeep Sethi, representing Jaitley, objected to Jethmalani referring to the Minister as being "guilty of crime and crookery".

During the proceedings, Jethmalani and some lawyers defending the AAP leaders contended that Jaitley was not entitled to the Rs 10 crore damages he has sought from Kejriwal and others.

In December 2015, Jaitley filed a civil defamation case against Kejriwal and AAP leaders Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh, Raghav Chadha and Deepak Bajpayee, claiming that they made "false and defamatory" statements in the case involving DDCA, thereby harming his reputation.

Jaitley has sought Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and other AAP leaders.

He had claimed that the AAP leaders attacked him over alleged irregularities and financial bungling in Delhi's cricket association, of which he was the president for about 13 years.

With inputs from agencies

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Delhi govt revokes fee-hike permission granted to top private school in Chanakyapuri area
India

Delhi govt revokes fee-hike permission granted to top private school in Chanakyapuri area

Delhi education minister Manish Sisodia announced the decision saying that the school's decision to increase its fees by almost 75 percent was unacceptable

Delhi riots: Police file chargesheet against 15 under UAPA for 'larger conspiracy'
India

Delhi riots: Police file chargesheet against 15 under UAPA for 'larger conspiracy'

The 17,000-page chargesheet also includes charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. Six more of the 21 arrested will be chargesheeted in due course, the police said

Delhi Police, amid criticism over riots chargesheet, says investigating 'all individuals' involved in February violence
India

Delhi Police, amid criticism over riots chargesheet, says investigating 'all individuals' involved in February violence

The police in a statement, said, 'Some are taking a few lines of the chargesheet out of context to create controversy and doubt about the investigation'