Supreme Court to deliver judgment today on pleas seeking review of verdict upholding Aadhaar validity

In a 4-1 verdict that also quashed some contentious provisions of the Aadhaar Act, the top court had in September 2018 upheld the passage of the Aadhaar Bill as Money Bill in Lok Sabha

Press Trust of India January 10, 2021 22:42:09 IST
Supreme Court to deliver judgment today on pleas seeking review of verdict upholding Aadhaar validity

File image of the Supreme Court of India. Reuters

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is scheduled to pronounce on Monday its verdict on pleas seeking review of a verdict upholding the Centre's flagship Aadhaar scheme as constitutionally valid but striking down some of its provisions, including its linking with bank accounts, mobile phones and school admissions.

A five-judge bench, comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, SA Nazeer and BR Gavai, will take up in-chambers a batch of review pleas challenging the 26 September, 2018 verdict.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra held that while Aadhaar would remain mandatory for filing of Income Tax Return and allotment of permanent account number (PAN), it would not be mandatory to link Aadhaar number to bank accounts and telecom service providers cannot seek its linking for mobile connections.

In a 4-1 verdict that also quashed some contentious provisions of the Aadhaar Act, the top court, however, had held Aadhaar would be needed for availing facilities of welfare schemes and government subsidies.

Ruling that seeding of Aadhaar would not be required for opening bank accounts, availing mobile services, by CBSE, NEET, JEE, UGC and for admissions in schools and free education for children, the top court had observed that Aadhaar had also become a household name and that its use has spread like a "wildfire".

It had struck down as unconstitutional the portion of Section 57 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 that permitted private entities like telecom companies or other corporates to avail of the biometric Aadhaar data.

Justice DY Chandrachud, who was part of the bench, had given a dissenting judgement in which he ruled the Aadhaar Act should not have been passed as a Money Bill as it amounts to fraud on the Constitution and is liable to be struck down.

But the majority verdict by the other four judges, including the then CJI, upheld the passage of the Aadhaar Bill as Money Bill in Lok Sabha.

Updated Date:

also read

NEET PG Counselling: Supreme Court to give order on EWS case today, a look at what the case is all about
India

NEET PG Counselling: Supreme Court to give order on EWS case today, a look at what the case is all about

The matter pending before the court has been filed by resident doctors who have challenged a 29 July 2021 notification by the Centre introducing 27 percent OBC quota and 10 percent EWS quota in the NEET all-India quota seats

SC asks Supertech to refund with interest all homebuyers invested in twin towers of Noida
Business

SC asks Supertech to refund with interest all homebuyers invested in twin towers of Noida

The Supreme Court bench, which was hearing contempt petitions of home buyers, seeking refund with an interest of the amount paid to buy their flats directed the Supertech to pay the amount by 28 February

SC directs Supertech to enter into contract within week with firm to demolish 40 storey twin-towers in Noida
India

SC directs Supertech to enter into contract within week with firm to demolish 40 storey twin-towers in Noida

The top court also directed Supertech Ltd to make the refund payments to the home buyers without prejudice to their rights and contentions