Supreme Court tells political parties to name and shame criminal lawmakers: Apex court issues five guidelines
The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued some directions to political parties as it left the matter of disqualification of politicians carrying criminal charges against them, to the Parliament saying that the court cannot add to the grounds of disqualification.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued some directions to political parties as it left the matter of disqualification of politicians carrying criminal charges against them to the Parliament saying that the court cannot add to the grounds of disqualification.
In view of its verdict, the apex court thought it was appropriate to issue the following directions which are in accord with the decisions of the court:
— Each contesting candidate shall fill up the form as provided by the Election Commission and the form must contain all the particulars as required therein.
— It shall state, in bold letters, with regard to the criminal cases pending against the candidate.
— If a candidate is contesting an election on the ticket of a particular party, he/she is required to inform the party about the criminal cases pending against him/her.
— The concerned political party shall be obligated to put up on its website the aforesaid information pertaining to candidates having criminal antecedents.
— The candidate as well as the concerned political party shall issue a declaration in the widely circulated newspapers in the locality about the antecedents of the candidate and also give wide publicity in the electronic media. "When we say wide publicity, we mean that the same shall be done at least thrice after the filing of the nomination papers," the court said in its judgment.
The judgment was pronounced by a Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra and comprising of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra.
The BJP's spending report showed that it spent over Rs 221 crore in Uttar Pradesh, over Rs 23 crore in Manipur, Rs 43.67 crore in Uttarakhand, more than Rs 36 crore in Punjab and Rs 19 crore in Goa
All women entitled to safe, legal abortion; rape includes marital rape for purpose of MTP Act: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court said the distinction between married and unmarried women under the abortion laws is artificial and constitutionally unsustainable and perpetuates the stereotype that only married woman are sexually active
Supreme Court Constitution bench to hear on 9 November plea related to Delhi-Centre row over control of services
The five-judge bench headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud said it would commence hearing the matter on a day-to-day basis