Supreme Court seeks Centre's response on fresh plea against 10 percent quota to general category poor

The apex court, which had earlier issued a notice to the Centre on similar petitions, Friday ordered tagging of the fresh plea of Tehseen Poonawalla with pending ones. Petitions have been filed by parties, including 'Janhit Abhiyan' and NGO 'Youth For Equality', challenging the Centre's decision.

Press Trust of India February 11, 2019 14:09:20 IST
Supreme Court seeks Centre's response on fresh plea against 10 percent quota to general category poor
  • The apex court, which had earlier issued a notice to the Centre on similar petitions, Friday ordered tagging of the fresh plea of Tehseen Poonawalla with pending ones

  • The fresh filed by businessman Poonawalla has sought quashing of the bill, saying that backwardness for the purpose of reservation cannot be defined by 'economic status alone'

  • The Modi government has come out with the constitutional amendment bill giving quota benefits to the poor among general category candidates

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday sought a response from the Centre on a fresh plea challenging its decision to grant 10 percent reservation in jobs and admissions to general category poor candidates. A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi also made it clear that there shall be no stay on the decision to grant quota to general category poor candidates.

The apex court, which had earlier issued a notice to the Centre on similar petitions, Friday ordered tagging of the fresh plea of Tehseen Poonawalla with pending ones. Petitions have been filed by parties, including 'Janhit Abhiyan' and NGO 'Youth For Equality', challenging the Centre's decision.

Supreme Court seeks Centres response on fresh plea against 10 percent quota to general category poor

File image of the Supreme Court of India. AP

The petition, filed by Youth For Equality through its president Kaushal Kant Mishra, has sought the quashing of the Constitution (103 Amendment) Act, 2019, saying that the economic criterion cannot be the sole basis for reservation and that the bill violates basic feature of the Constitution as reservation on economic grounds cannot be limited to the general category and the overall 50 percent ceiling limit cannot be breached. In the present form, the upper limit of quota goes up to 60 percent which violated the decisions of the apex court.

Referring to the nine-judge bench decision of the apex court in the landmark 1992 Indira Sawhney case, the petition said the latest amendment completely violated the Constitutional norm that economic criterion cannot be the only basis of reservation.

It also said that the amendments fail to consider that Articles 14 and 16 form the basic feature of equality, and that they have been violated with the doing away of the restraints that were imposed on the reservation policy, i.e. the 50 percent ceiling limit and the exclusion of economic status as a sole criterion.

Later in a press release, the organisation said in principle it's a welcome step and that deprivation and not caste has been made the basis of protective discrimination. "However, the limit of total reservation is increased to 60 percent. This will open a Pandora's box. Now more and more political parties/caste groups will claim for an increased percentage of reservations, both at the Centre and state level," it said.

The fresh filed by businessman Poonawalla has sought quashing of the bill, saying that backwardness for the purpose of reservation cannot be defined by "economic status alone". The top court had earlier refused to stay the Modi government's decision to grant the reservation but agreed to examine the validity of the constitutional amendment which paved the way for this quota.

In a poll year, the Modi government has come out with the constitutional amendment bill giving quota benefits to the poor among general category candidates. The quota will be over and above the existing 50 percent reservation to SCs, STs and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). The Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha cleared the bill on 8 and 9 January respectively, and has been signed by President Ram Nath Kovind.

Updated Date:

also read

Ad-hoc judges not to be appointed at expense of regular judges in high courts, rules SC
India

Ad-hoc judges not to be appointed at expense of regular judges in high courts, rules SC

The apex court, however, cited the dormant Article 224A to allow the appointment of retired judges for a period of two to three years to clear the backlog of cases

Clean chit to Uttar Pradesh police in Vikas Dubey encounter case, panel says no evidence of wrongdoing
India

Clean chit to Uttar Pradesh police in Vikas Dubey encounter case, panel says no evidence of wrongdoing

No witnesses came forward to challenge the police claims even after advertisements in newspapers and media, neither did the media come forward to record their versions

Rohingya detained in Jammu not to be deported to Myanmar without due process, says Supreme Court
India

Rohingya detained in Jammu not to be deported to Myanmar without due process, says Supreme Court

On 6 March, 168 Rohingya found living illegally in Jammu during a verification drive were shifted to a holding centre