Supreme Court refuses to hear Justice Karnan's plea against his six-month jail term
The Supreme Court has refused to list and hear Justice C S Karnan's plea seeking recall of the order awarding six-month jail term for contempt of court
New Delhi: Calcutta High Court judge Justice C S Karnan, evading arrest since 9 May, has received yet another jolt from the Supreme Court, which has refused to list and hear his plea seeking recall of the order awarding six-month jail term for contempt of court.
The petition was held as "not maintainable" by the apex court registry.
"It is thus manifestly clear from the averments made in the petition that the petitioner intends to impugn and challenge the judicial order passed by this court on 9 May, 2017, in the suo motu petition.
"The proceedings therein were decided on merits and after due consideration, it was held that Justice C S Karnan had committed contempt of the gravest nature resulting in finding of guilt. As a sequel the petitioner also stands convicted and sentenced to an imprisonment of six months. The said findings have since attained finality," an apex court registrar, who deals with listing of fresh writ petitions, said in his order.
"I am constrained but to hold that the present writ petition is not maintainable. The relief if any lies somewhere else. I thus see no reasonable cause to receive the present writ petition for registration under the provisions of Supreme Court rules, 2013", the registrar said. The order was passed on 12 May and sent to Justice Karnan's lawyers three days later. Karnan is yet to be arrested.
The judge, through his lawyers, had moved the apex court seeking a recall of the 9 May order of the seven-judge bench which had held him guilty of contempt of court and sentenced him to six months imprisonment by ordering the West Bengal police to take him into custody forthwith.
On 12 May, Justice Karnan, whom the West Bengal police are looking for, had moved the apex court for reliefs saying neither high courts nor their judges are "subordinate" to it.
"The petitioner, a judge of the High Court of Calcutta, is not under any disciplinary jurisdiction of either the Chief Justice of India (CJI) or the bench of seven judges constituted by the CJI, as in the instant case," the plea, filed through lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara, said.
He had sought recall of the apex court order awarding him six-month imprisonment, saying that he could not be held guilty of 'contempt of court'.
He had said if the allegations levelled against him were untrue, then "it would at the most amount to defamation".
"Under our constitutional scheme, high courts are not subordinate to the Supreme Court; high courts are as much independent as the Supreme Court is, though their orders could be judicially challenged in the Supreme Court, the latter being a Court of Appeal," the petition said.
Justice Karnan said the Contempt of Courts Act was a "cathartic jurisprudence which belonged to the Dark Ages, the era of inquisition and torture, distinct from the classical Roman Law which constitutes the foundation of the modern jurisprudence."
He has said the show cause notice issued by a seven-judge bench to him on February 8 be declared "unconstitutional" as it was against "the principles of natural justice".
He has also sought a stay on all "further proceedings" pursuant to the 9 May order holding him guilty of contempt and award of six months jail term.
Meanwhile, the lawyers representing Justice Karnan have claimed that a representation has been made to the President seeking suspension of the Supreme Court order sentencing him to six-month imprisonment for contempt.
However, the president's office said, "It was not aware of any such representation."
Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.
Over the years, given the lack of general faith in India's law enforcement system, the CBI has managed to maintain the public perception of being a professional investigating agency
Dissent in Congress: As disgruntlement resurfaces, time for party to move forward; mere introspection is not enough
At the national level, the Congress needs to revive itself to provide the necessary framework for a national Opposition
AIFF fears de-recognition by FIFA if run by ad-hoc body as it seeks extension of current executive committee's tenure
The four-year term of the current executive committee, led by Praful Patel, ends next month and the AIFF has announced that its AGM will be held as scheduled.