What happens when a vociferous liberal Muslim, who speaks out on issues related to secularism, terrorism and relationship of religion and politics, comes face to face with a former Captain of the Indian Army, who can reel out detail after detail about “lessons” from the Second World War, other battles and even hostage crises—such as the one in Russia’s Beslan, much like a war historian. Well, you have to wait to find out. Tarek Fatah, a straight-shooter and a man who finds no virtue in an Islamic State, will be in conversation with former CEO of Natgrid (National Intelligence Grid), a trained Indian Army Captain and a TEDx India regular. One of India’s highest paid technocrats, Raman was recruited by the government to head Natgrid post the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. Incidentally, today the tragic incident marks its seventh year. This report in The Economic Times
shared an interesting anecdote about Raman. After reading a paper authored by Raman, a senior officer told his ward jokingly, “Anyone who writes like this is destined to either be a general or be court-martialed.” [caption id=“attachment_2522710” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]
Canadian author Tarek Fatah. Image courtesy: IBNLive[/caption] Raman had surmised in his paper that the Indian Army adopted a farcical mix of the Nato and Warsaw doctrines; “while the former alignment, equipped with state-of-the-art weapons, would not “cede an inch”, the low-cost-arms-using Warsaw line-up let enemy forces advance until the time was ripe for them to strike back. Raman wrote that India followed the Nato policy with cheap “Warsaw equipment”.” Fatah has been known to speak on issues of terrorism, the Islamic State, communal intolerance and the compulsion that fuel these movements. This Pakistan-born Canadian author has trekked rugged terrain and generated controversy along with admiration. His books, Chasing a mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State and The Jew is Not My Enemy: Unveiling the Myths that Fuel Muslim Anti-Semitism, are a reflection of a strong personal conviction that the unsaid turns sour if kept that way and has to articulated and discussed and even if it ruffles feathers so be it.. Not many people are endowed with that kind of courage and Fatah, it has to be said, does not provoke for the sake of provocation. His path is one of more prudent debate and logic, ready to take on board every point of view, so far as his is also given an airing. When Firstpost asked Fatah earlier today why should people come to watch him talk, this is what the secular-liberal had to say: “They should come and try to figure out if they are sick and tired of politically correct nonsense that you here so often on television channel’s, especially in India. If you want to have a heart to heart conversation with somebody and want to ask or tell me that I’m wrong in saying something, please do come.”