'Give us judges a break': Justice DY Chandrachud on news reports of delay in hearings

'Give us judges a break': Justice DY Chandrachud on news reports of delay in hearings

“Give us judges a break. I was down with Covid, hence the matter (attacks on Christians case) was deferred. I read in the news that judges are not taking it up. There is a limit to targeting us,” said the judge.

Advertisement
'Give us judges a break': Justice DY Chandrachud on news reports of delay in hearings

New Delhi: Supreme Court judge DY Chandrachud on Thursday expressed his displeasure over reports suggesting that judges were not taking up cases, saying that there was a limit to targeting the judiciary.

Justice Chandrachud said that he read in a newspaper that a case relating to violence against Christians was not being taken up when he was hearing a mention by a lawyer seeking the listing for the same.

Advertisement

“Give us judges a break. I was down with Covid, hence the matter was deferred. I read in the news that judges are not taking it up. There is a limit to targeting us,” said the judge.

The matter was listed for hearing on 15 July but it could not be taken up as the bench did not assemble. The plea filed by Archbishop Of Bangalore Diocese Dr. Peter Machado alleged a rising number of attacks on Christian institutions and priests across the country.

The plea sought directions to stop violence and mob attacks against the members of the Christian community in various states across the country also seeking the implementation of earlier apex court guidelines to curb hate crimes.

The petition has sought the setting up of Special Investigation Teams with officers from outside the states where the incidents set out to register FIRs, conduct criminal investigations and prosecute the criminal offenders in accordance with the law.

Advertisement

It further sought direction that the SITs file closure reports in accordance with the law, where false counter FIRs have been filed by the assailants against the victims.

It has also sought implementation of the guidelines issued in the Tehseen Poonawala judgment in which nodal officers were to be appointed to take note of hate crimes and register FIRs across the nation.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court 2018, had issued a slew of guidelines for the Centre and State governments to control and prevent the increasing number of hate crimes, including mob violence and lynching.

The guidelines included fast-tracked trials, victim compensation, deterrent punishment and disciplinary action against lax law-enforcing officials. The top court had said offences such as hate crimes, cow vigilantism and lynching incidents should be nipped in the bud.

Advertisement

With inputs from ANI

Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram .

Latest News

Find us on YouTube

Subscribe

Top Shows

Vantage First Sports Fast and Factual Between The Lines