State associations of Haryana, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra barred from BCCI Annual General Meeting over failure to amend constitutions

The TNCA, which elected N Srinivasan's daughter Rupa Gurunath, had 21 violations in their amended Constitution, including non-compliance in age cap (over 70 years), tenure of the cooling-off period

Press Trust of India, Oct 09, 2019 21:26:59 IST

Pune: Tamil Nadu Cricket Association (TNCA), Haryana Cricket Association (HCA) and Maharashtra Cricket Association (MCA) have been barred by the Committee of Administrators (CoA) from attending the BCCI Annual General Meeting (AGM) in Mumbai on 23 October due to non-compliance in their amended Constitutions.

This effectively means that the three non-compliant units will not have any voting rights in case there is an election during the scheduled AGM.

State associations of Haryana, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra barred from BCCI Annual General Meeting over failure to amend constitutions

Representational image of BCCI. AFP

"Yes, the CoA has intimated the two state units that they would be barred from participating in the elections as they have not amended their Constitutions as per Supreme Court orders on 9 August 2018. Maharashtra is also going to be debarred from attending the AGM," a source close to CoA told PTI on condition of anonymity.

CoA chief Vinod Rai, who is currently in the USA, was unavailable for comment.

The TNCA, which is under the control of former BCCI president N Srinivasan's daughter Rupa Gurunath, was supposed to be represented by its secretary SS Ramasaamy while Haryana, under the rule of outgoing treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry, was set to be represented by Mrinal Ojha.

Even Maharashtra is going to be debarred from AGM as the Charity Commissioner of the state had found anomalies in their amended constitution. The unit still under the control of former Board secretary Ajay Shirke, was supposed to be represented by Riyaz Bagban.

The TNCA, which recently elected Srinivasan's daughter Rupa Gurunath, had 21 violations in their amended Constitution, including non-compliance in age cap (over 70 years), tenure of the cooling-off period being a few major ones.

Even after they complied with a few, later on, they didn't adhere to the major reforms and had taken a tough stand that it is not in CoA's authority to debar any state unit as their job is to merely file a status report on compliance.

Haryana and Maharashtra also toed the same line.

On part of CoA, their argument is that the elections are being conducted under their watch and no non-compliant association will be allowed to take part in the AGM.

Now the implication of this decision could be two-fold and the BCCI could be divided on this issue.

In case, there are unanimous choices for the five office-bearers' post (president, vice president, secretary, joint secretary and treasurer), it won't mean much even if they are debarred.

"If TNCA, Haryana and Maharashtra move court and get a stay on AGM, the CoA stays on. Do we want that? Not me at least as I want to get the board back from CoA on 23 October and take it from there," a former office-bearer and Board veteran told PTI.

"In any case, Srinivasan is playing an active role in decision making and is in touch with influential people who would have the final say in these matters. So if the posts are pre-decided, CoA's strategy to not let TNCA, Haryana doesn't hold much ground," the official said.

This time at the AGM, maybe just four to five people will be there who would have attended a big Board meeting, which was a regular feature till 2015.

"Only having first-timers is also not a great thing. We need the experience to guide as the Board is in a mess," said a first-time president of a state unit, who could get a major role in the Board's functioning.

Many in the Board believe that once CoA goes, everyone can come around together and decide upon the further course of action.

There is a school of thought that India, having lost its position and power of bargaining in the ICC, should get it back and who better than Srinivasan to do that.

"There is no age-cap of representation in the ICC. Mr Srinivasan has been the reason why we had such clout in the ICC. There is no harm if he again represents India at the ICC. We can do that after getting the Board back and for that we should avoid another round of legal tussle," said a disqualified BCCI veteran.

Updated Date: Oct 09, 2019 21:26:59 IST






Rank Team Points Rating
1 India 4027 115
2 New Zealand 2829 109
3 South Africa 2917 108
4 England 4366 104
5 Australia 3270 99
6 Sri Lanka 3795 95
Rank Team Points Rating
1 England 6745 125
2 India 7071 122
3 New Zealand 4837 112
4 Australia 5543 111
5 South Africa 5193 110
6 Pakistan 5019 98
Rank Team Points Rating
1 Pakistan 7748 277
2 England 4253 266
3 South Africa 4720 262
4 India 8620 261
5 Australia 5471 261
6 New Zealand 4784 252