 "No F-16 fighter jets for Ukraine: What does this mean for the country?")
Washington: For Ukraine , the United States and its NATO allies, the playbook has now become standardised.
First, Kyiv asks for an advanced weapons system. The Biden administration says no and quietly suggests that Ukraine could get the same type of weapon from its European neighbours, in half the time.
But NATO countries in Europe, still smarting from former President Donald Trump’s oft-spoken wish to break up the alliance, refuse to commit to sending anything to Ukraine that would provoke Russia unless the United States is right in there with them. So, after months of hemming and hawing, the Biden administration says yes, and the gates to more weapons open.
So, it was with air defence systems, when President Joe Biden decided in late December to send a Patriot battery to Ukraine, and Germany and the Netherlands then announced that they, too, would send Patriot launchers and missiles.
So, it was with armoured fighting vehicles, with France and Germany opening up their larders once the Biden administration signalled in January that it would send Bradleys. So it was with tanks, with Germany agreeing to send Leopard 2 tanks once the Biden administration agreed to send the American M1A2 Abrams.
Now it is the fighter jets, the latest item on the Ukrainian acquisition wish list. Kyiv has asked for dozens of F-16s , the single-engine fighter jet developed in the 1970s by General Dynamics and the US Air Force. Almost 50 years later, Air Force pilots are still flying the F-16, as are pilots in a host of US partner nations.
Impact Shorts
More ShortsUkraine wants them to provide air support for troops as they seek to reclaim cities and towns in the east and the south where Russian troops have dug in, and to protect their cities and towns from Moscow’s attack planes.
Following the usual script, the Biden administration is saying no — but officials hasten to say, privately, that no is probably temporary.
After Biden said “no” when a reporter asked Monday if the United States would provide F-16 fighters to Ukraine, senior officials quickly followed up in conversations afterward. Several said Biden’s “no” did not preclude the administration from deciding later to provide F-16s or, more likely, working out an agreement that would allow another country to send its own American-made F-16s to Ukraine.
“We are constantly talking to the Ukrainians, and we are constantly talking to our allies and partners about capabilities that they need,” John Kirby, the National Security Council spokesperson, told reporters Tuesday.
In a post on his Telegram channel Monday, Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said that “the work on obtaining F-16 fighters is ongoing,” adding that Ukraine had seen “positive signs from Poland, which is ready to transfer them in coordination with NATO.”
But US and European officials say it is more likely that such transfers would come from Denmark or the Netherlands. The Dutch Cabinet would consider a request from Kyiv for F-16s with an “open mind,” Dutch news site NL Times quoted Foreign Minister Wopke Hoekstra as saying last month.
The Netherlands has around 40 F-16s and is transitioning to the more advanced F-35 fighter (made by Lockheed Martin), so sending some of its F-16s to Ukraine would make sense, US officials said.
The US government must approve sales or transfers of F-16s from partner nations to third-party countries, which means that any NATO member that wants to send its American-made fighter jets to Ukraine must first get a green light from the Biden administration.
That permission, two officials said, could help reassure NATO countries that are concerned about being singled out by Russia for sending the advanced fighter planes to Ukraine.
“We have a pattern; if we say we will provide categories of equipment, then our allies will do so,” said Evelyn Farkas, the top Pentagon official for Ukraine during the Obama administration. “They seem to be super afraid of Russia directing ire at any one NATO country.”
In the case of the Abrams tanks, just the announcement last week that the United States would send them was enough to unlock the German Leopard 2 tanks, even though the Pentagon says the Abrams probably will not arrive on the battlefield for months, if not years. Britain’s earlier pledge to send its Challenger tanks was not enough to bring the rest of Europe along, officials acknowledge.
[caption id=“attachment_12091792” align=“alignnone” width=“640”] Officials say that if the usual scenario plays out, the Biden administration’s reluctance to provide the planes could be temporary. AP[/caption]
At the moment, the Biden administration views advanced fighter aircraft as something a modern Ukrainian air force will undoubtedly get directly from the United States, but in the future. Pentagon officials say they want to prioritise weapons that can help Kyiv right now.
The Biden administration is preparing a new weapons package for Ukraine, administration officials said this week. The package, at $2.2 billion, is expected to include longer-range rockets, but those would most likely not be delivered for several months, if not years.
Bigger and better weapons that are publicly promised but not delivered right away still serve a purpose, US officials said, of sending a message to Russia. A Ukrainian military that is fortified by fighter jets and tanks in perhaps a year would be able to mount counteroffensives to take back territory seized by Moscow.
Officials say the top priorities for Ukraine right now are air defence systems, artillery and then armoured and mechanised systems.
But Ukraine, whose pilots fly Soviet-era jets, including MiG-29s, has been adamant that it wants Western fighters.
Because so many US allies have F-16s, the supply chain for the advanced fighters is well supported around the world, which would make it easier for Ukraine to maintain them, said Michael Fantini, a retired major general who flew F-16s during the Iraq War. He called the fighter the “most manoeuvrable ever built, with the exception of the F-22” — another fighter jet.
He said the plane could make a “significant contribution” on the battlefields and in the skies above Ukraine.
Yurii Ihnat, the spokesperson for the Ukrainian air force, said in a briefing last week that it would take Ukrainian pilots a “couple of weeks” to learn how to fly the fighters but “about six months” to master how to fight with the aircraft.
President Emmanuel Macron of France said Monday that his country had not ruled out sending fighter jets to Ukraine, but he laid out several conditions. Among them: that providing such equipment would not lead to an escalation of tensions or be used “to touch Russian soil,” Macron said.
US officials say that after a year of warning the Ukrainians not to fire Western weaponry into Russia, the Ukrainian military has earned their trust.
Helene Cooper and Eric Schmitt, c.2023 The New York Times Company
Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
