No adverse impact from Supreme Court ruling on Aadhaar-based accounts, says Kotak Mahindra Bank
Kotak Mahindra Bank has been able to increase its share of savings account deposits courtesy its '811' accounts which can be opened instantly using Aadhaar details.
Mumbai: Kotak Mahindra Bank, among the first domestic lenders to start an Aadhaar-based account opening, Wednesday said it does not see any adverse impact of the apex court ruling on the validity of the identity document.
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by chief justice Dipak Misra Wednesday held that while Aadhaar would remain mandatory for filing of IT returns and allotment of permanent account numbers (PAN), it would not be mandatory to link Aadhaar to bank accounts and the telecom service providers cannot seek its linking for mobile connections.
The private sector lender has been able to increase its share of savings account deposits courtesy its '811' accounts which can be opened instantly using Aadhaar details.
"We do not foresee any adverse impact on our savings account opening growth because of the Supreme Court ruling," bank's president for retail liabilities and branch banking Virat Diwanji said in a statement.
He further said Aadhaar continues to be available as a KYC (know-your-customer) document if a customer voluntarily chooses to submit the same.
"Aadhaar continues to be one of the six officially valid documents (OVDs) available to customers for completing KYC requirements," he said.
The city-headquartered bank is targeting to double its number of accounts to 16 million in two years through the 811 zero balance accounts.
The Supreme Court had been informed by the Centre that the counselling for NEET-MDS 2020 will be conducted as per existing reservation policies or norms
States responsible for implementation of 2015 judgement scrapping Section 66A of IT Act: Centre tells SC
The Centre said it has also requested them for submission of reports to the IT ministry on the number of cases booked under Section 66A of the IT Act, and directing them to withdraw any prosecution invoking 66A.
The application, which raised the issue related to Kerala, claimed it is shocking that in a medical emergency, the government is playing with the lives of citizens through such measures