 "Ukraine's 'war hero' and ambassador who could be its next president")
Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine’s ambassador to the United Kingdom, is a man who embodies both the nation’s resilience on the battlefield and its uncertainty about the future. Once hailed as the saviour of Kyiv for orchestrating the defence against Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, the general known as the ‘Iron General’ now serves far from the frontlines.
His reassignment came after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy dismissed him as commander-in-chief in February 2024, a decision framed as a necessary renewal of military leadership but interpreted by many as the sidelining of a political rival, BBC reported. By July of that year, Zaluzhnyi had been dispatched to London as ambassador, tasked with representing Ukraine abroad while remaining under the close watch of the administration that had removed him from power.
The shift from military uniform to diplomatic suit was abrupt. For Zaluzhnyi, it marked a dramatic change in pace after two years of high-intensity wartime leadership. His London posting may appear ceremonial, but it has not insulated him from politics. Instead, it has placed him at the centre of speculation about Ukraine’s eventual postwar transition and who will lead the nation through it.
Rising popularity of the ‘Iron General’
At home, Zaluzhnyi’s reputation remains formidable. Polling consistently shows him as one of Ukraine’s most trusted figures, often outranking Zelenskyy himself. A recent survey by the New Voice of Ukraine suggested that while Zelenskyy currently maintains a narrow lead in first-round voting intentions, Zaluzhnyi would decisively defeat the president in a hypothetical runoff, taking over 60 per cent of decided voters. This data reinforces the perception that he is the only figure with the credibility and popularity to mount a serious challenge to the incumbent.
Much of this trust stems from his wartime leadership. As commander-in-chief, Zaluzhnyi coordinated the defence of Kyiv during the early days of Russia’s assault, when many predicted the capital would fall within days. He became a symbol of calm professionalism in contrast to Russia’s miscalculations. For soldiers and civilians alike, his image became intertwined with Ukraine’s survival. Even after his dismissal, that symbolic capital has endured.
Dismissal and political tensions
Zelenskyy’s decision to replace Zaluzhnyi with General Oleksandr Syrskyi in early 2024 reflected deepening tensions within Ukraine’s wartime leadership. Officially, the change was framed as a renewal aimed at making military command “more technologically advanced” and better adapted to the evolving realities of the battlefield.
But many observers pointed to the political dimension: Zelenskyy had grown uneasy with his commander’s soaring popularity and his near-mythical status within the army.
This unease was not unfounded. Internal polling, leaked at the time, showed that Zaluzhnyi’s trust ratings were climbing above the president’s, making him a potential alternative in the eyes of the public and international backers alike.
Impact Shorts
More ShortsOpposition politicians openly criticised the dismissal, warning it was a grave mistake that could undermine morale and stability. Despite official efforts to downplay rivalry, the move crystallised the perception that Zelenskyy saw Zaluzhnyi as a political threat.
Rumours of a campaign in London
Since arriving in London, Zaluzhnyi has attracted a steady stream of political visitors—from Ukrainian MPs to business representatives and foreign operatives—hoping to gauge whether he plans to enter politics.
The Guardian reported that even figures linked to Donald Trump’s orbit attempted to reach out to Zaluzhnyi earlier this year, shortly after a tense Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy. Zaluzhnyi refused to take their call, signalling his unwillingness to undermine Ukraine’s sitting president despite their differences.
Still, rumours swirl.
In March 2025, speculation erupted when journalists claimed a campaign headquarters for Zaluzhnyi had quietly opened in London, led by opposition MP Viktoria Siumar and former BBC reporter Oksana Torop.
Both Zaluzhnyi’s team and Torop publicly denied the claims insisting that no campaign had begun and that his focus remained on diplomacy and national survival. But the mere existence of such rumours reflects the widespread expectation—among supporters and detractors alike—that Zaluzhnyi may eventually seek the presidency, Kyiv Post said.
Loyalty and ambition
Zaluzhnyi himself has remained disciplined in his public posture. He rarely grants interviews and avoids venues where questions about his political future could arise. His aides insist that he has no intention of launching a campaign while Ukraine is still at war.
According to sources cited by The Guardian, he has privately pledged to Zelenskyy’s chief of staff that if he ever chooses to pursue politics, he would inform the president’s office first. This balancing act shows his military background, where loyalty and hierarchy carry weight, but also hints at his strategic patience.
Many say Zaluzhnyi is adopting a “wait and see” approach. Volodymyr Fesenko, a Kyiv-based commentator, described his strategy as waiting until the last possible moment before elections to decide, a tactic designed to maximise his advantage while minimising risk. By staying out of open confrontation with Zelenskyy, he preserves his reputation as a national unifier rather than a partisan challenger.
A hero abroad, a contender at home
As ambassador, Zaluzhnyi’s role has been limited compared to his wartime prominence, but he remains a figure of fascination both in London and Kyiv. His occasional public appearances—whether in a Ukrainian Vogue photoshoot or attending a play in the West End—have drawn mixed reactions at home, where images of normality abroad can clash with the country’s ongoing suffering.
Yet his continued consultations with military commanders and monitoring of battlefield conditions from London illustrate that, even in diplomatic exile, he remains tied to the war effort.
Internationally, Zaluzhnyi is seen by some as a potential stabilising figure for Ukraine’s future political scenario. His reputation as a decisive commander could reassure allies that Kyiv will remain firmly committed to resisting Russian aggression. But his ascent could also complicate relations, particularly if his rise is perceived as engineered by outside actors eager for a change in leadership.
Shadow of Zelenskyy
For now, Zelenskyy retains the presidency, bolstered by his global stature and his role as Ukraine’s voice abroad. His government has also benefitted from recent improvements in relations with the United States, easing fears in Kyiv about losing crucial support. Nevertheless, the president’s approval ratings have slipped and frustrations over corruption, stalled counter-offensives and domestic governance have created space for alternatives.
Zaluzhnyi’s potential candidacy represents the most formidable of these alternatives. Unlike other opposition figures—such as former president Petro Poroshenko or former parliamentary speaker Dmytro Razumkov—Zaluzhnyi carries the aura of victory in Ukraine’s darkest hour. That symbolic weight, combined with polling numbers, explains why many inside and outside Ukraine view him as the “natural next president.”
A future yet to be decided
No elections are currently scheduled in Ukraine, with voting suspended under martial law. Even Zelenskyy’s critics generally acknowledge that holding an election during ongoing hostilities is impractical and dangerous. But politics cannot be postponed indefinitely. When the war eventually shifts into a new phase, the question of leadership will reemerge with urgency.
Whether Zaluzhnyi steps into that role remains uncertain. His reticence, his insistence on loyalty during wartime, and his cautious avoidance of open conflict with Zelenskyy suggest a man weighing responsibility against ambition. Yet his popularity and the expectations placed upon him may make a political career unavoidable once peace returns.
For Ukraine, the choice between Zelenskyy and Zaluzhnyi may ultimately symbolise a broader debate.
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
 "Russian drones over Poland: Trump’s tepid reaction a wake-up call for Nato?")
 "As Russia pushes east, Ukraine faces mounting pressure to defend its heartland")
 "Why Mossad was not on board with Israel’s strike on Hamas in Qatar")
 "Turkey: Erdogan's police arrest opposition mayor Hasan Mutlu, dozens officials in corruption probe")
