SBI refuses to give electoral bond details under RTI

The State Bank of India has declined to disclose details of electoral bonds furnished to the Election Commission (EC) under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

The bank asserts that such information is held in a fiduciary capacity and qualifies as personal data, despite the records being publicly available on the poll panel’s website.

The Supreme Court, deeming the electoral bonds scheme “unconstitutional and manifestly arbitrary,” instructed SBI on February 15 to provide comprehensive details of bonds purchased since April 12, 2019, to the EC for publication on its website by March 13.

Dismissing SBI’s petition for an extension, the court ordered the bank to disclose the information to the EC by the close of business hours on March 12.

More from World

This Week in Explainers: How recovering from Gen-Z protests is a Himalayan task for Nepal Zohran Mamdani says he would arrest Netanyahu if he is elected as NYC mayor, calls Israeli PM 'war criminal'

Following the Supreme Court’s directive, RTI activist Commodore Lokesh Batra (retired) requested the SBI on March 13 for the complete digital data of electoral bonds as submitted to the EC.

However, the bank refused to comply, citing exemption clauses under the RTI Act—section 8(1)(e) pertaining to records held in a fiduciary capacity and section 8(1)(j) allowing the withholding of personal information.

“Information sought by you is containing details of purchasers and political parties and hence, cannot be disclosed as it is held in fiduciary capacity disclosure of which is exempted under sections 8(1)(e) and (j) of the RTI Act,” the response furnished by the central public information officer and deputy general manager of the SBI said on Wednesday.

Impact Shorts

More Shorts

‘The cries of this widow will echo’: In first public remarks, Erika Kirk warns Charlie’s killers they’ve ‘unleashed a fire’

Trump urges Nato to back sanctions on Russia, calls for 50–100% tariffs on China

Batra had also sought the details of the fees paid by the SBI to senior advocate Harish Salve to defend its case against the disclosure of the electoral bonds’ records, citing that the records are held in a fiduciary capacity and the information is personal in nature.

It is “bizzare” that the SBI denied the information that is already on the EC’s website, Batra told PTI.

On the question of Salve’s fee, he said the bank has denied information that involves taxpayers’ money.

The EC published the data furnished by the SBI on its website on March 14, with the details of the donors and political parties that redeemed the bonds.

On March 15, the apex court pulled up the SBI for not furnishing the complete information by withholding the numbers unique to each electoral bond that would help match the donors with the recipient political parties, saying the bank was “duty-bound” to reveal the information.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud said it had directed the disclosure of all the details of the bonds, including the names of the purchasers, amounts and dates of purchase.

All details have to be furnished by the SBI, the CJI observed, as the court admonished the bank for furnishing incomplete information, a day after the EC put out the entire list of entities that purchased the bonds for making political donations.

The SBI had said a total of 22,217 electoral bonds of varying denominations were purchased by the donors between April 1, 2019 and February 15 this year, of which 22,030 were redeemed by political parties.

With inputs from PTI