China probes what China does: Plagiarism scandal shakes Beijing’s state-backed literary scene

In recent months, an anonymous Chinese blogger operating under the alias ‘Lyrical Forest’ has rattled the foundations of China’s state-subsidised literary establishment. Known for his meticulous side-by-side text comparisons, he has published a growing archive of cases where notable Chinese authors appear to have closely mirrored the works of international literary figures.

From Ian McEwan to Albert Camus and Gabriel García Márquez, the list of foreign authors allegedly plagiarised reads like a syllabus of global literature’s greats.

According to Sanlian Life Weekly, this digital detective began his journey innocently — reading children’s literature to his own child — only to discover passages strikingly similar to those of Japanese author Naoko Yasubo. That discovery quickly led to further investigations and a broader campaign, culminating in widespread exposure of what many are now calling systemic plagiarism within the Chinese literary community.

More from World

Trump’s war against the world comes at America’s expense Why is an anime pirate flag causing uproar ahead of Indonesia's independence day?

Silence of the literary establishment

Despite the mounting evidence, China’s literary elite has largely chosen to look the other way. Most of the authors implicated—including highly decorated writers published in leading journals such as Harvest, People’s Literature and October — have yet to respond to the accusations. Only one author, Sun Pin, has publicly apologised. The rest remain silent, with some issuing vague denials or sidestepping the issue entirely.

‘Lyrical Forest’, whose online following surged from 1,000 to over 6,000 within weeks, insists his aim is not personal vindication but rather a moral reckoning within the literary world. He told Sanlian Life Weekly that his work was about justice and protecting originality, not shaming individuals.

Still, his revelations have been met with hostility by parts of the publishing community, with at least one editor reportedly pressuring him to delete his findings, framing the overlaps as mere “coincidence.”

A crisis of confidence

The scandal comes at a moment when public trust in China’s cultural institutions is already fragile. The inaction of major literary journals has struck a nerve with readers, many of whom see their silence as complicity.

As iNews pointed out, the only serious institutional response has come from Hong Kong Literature, which issued a rare and commendable statement acknowledging the problem, taking responsibility and pledging reform. In contrast, the mainland’s major outlets have either ignored the scandal or subtly mocked the whistleblower.

Quick Reads

View All

Greek farmers bring nation to standstill as blockades hit ports, roads and airports

Amid record trade surplus, China has a big worry — factory deflation is now in 38th month

This divergence has only fuelled suspicion that China’s literary sphere—long subsidised and shaped by the state — is more concerned with preserving its internal hierarchies than safeguarding artistic integrity.

From copycat culture to amateur renaissance

China’s literary community is no stranger to allegations of copying. The case of Ye Weilin in the 1990s, who plagiarised Russian and Chinese writers before ultimately apologising, serves as a notable precedent.

But what sets today’s situation apart is both the scale of exposure and the digital tools available to track it. Free plagiarism checkers, online archives and widespread reader engagement have enabled a grassroots accountability movement that couldn’t have existed a generation ago.

This climate has sparked a resurgence of what some are calling “amateur writing.” Uncredentialed writers, many without formal literary backgrounds or publishing contracts, are gaining recognition online.

According to commentary shared by Sanlian Life Weekly, many of these newcomers see the scandal as a clearing of the deck — an opportunity to write without conforming to the industry’s often insular, and now discredited, gatekeeping structures.

‘Lyrical Forest’ himself is emblematic of this shift. Formerly employed in trend forecasting, he has no literary pedigree or professional ties to publishing. Yet his precise, methodical approach has outclassed the editorial oversight of entire magazines. He maintains that he never labels works as plagiarised outright, merely presenting the evidence and letting the public decide.

Moral bankruptcy or institutional rot?

For some observers, the scandal lays bare a deeper moral rot. As iNews put it, the literary world has ceased to be a sanctuary for talent, instead becoming a refuge for mediocrity propped up by mutual praise and prestige awards. Well-known authors like Mo Yan and Yu Hua, who have been associated with some of the plagiarists or praised their work, have remained conspicuously silent.

The publication noted that the halo effect — where the fame of an author shields them from scrutiny — has created a space where even poorly written or unoriginal works are applauded. One particularly scathing remark described the literary scene as a “granary covered with green hair,” suggesting that the problem is no longer a few bad actors but a systemic decay.

In this context, plagiarism is not an aberration but a symptom of a literary culture that has lost its ethical compass. Institutions that should have served as arbiters of quality and guardians of originality are now seen by many as hollow facades, resistant to criticism and divorced from the very readers they claim to serve.

China’s broader copying controversy

This literary scandal also taps into a long-running narrative about China’s developmental model — one often accused of thriving on imitation. From the replication of Western technological designs to military hardware and even cultural practices, the notion of China “copying the West” has become a trope in international discourse.

Yet what makes this particular episode unique is that the accusation is coming from within. The bloggers, readers and amateur critics now challenging the establishment are not foreign observers but Chinese citizens disillusioned with the lack of originality in their national literature. Their frustration reflects a deeper cultural anxiety about authenticity, merit and moral integrity.

An industry at a crossroads

The fallout from the plagiarism scandal may well shape the future of Chinese literature. Will it provoke genuine reform, with greater accountability and openness to new voices? Or will the establishment continue its defensive crouch, banking on the short memory of the public?

For now, ‘Lyrical Forest’ continues his solitary battle, bolstered by a community of readers who value honesty over pedigree. Whether or not the industry listens, his work has exposed a truth many already suspected, that behind the façade of state-endorsed brilliance lies a fragile ecosystem — one held together not by creativity, but by silence.