Vantage | What does throwing soup over Mona Lisa really achieve?

The Mona Lisa, a masterpiece created by Leonardo da Vinci in the 16th century, is undeniably one of the world’s most renowned paintings. However, its fame has recently made it a peculiar target for an unusual form of protest. On a recent Sunday, two activists threw soup at the iconic painting, not with the intention of causing harm, but rather to draw attention to their cause – the right to healthy food. This unconventional tactic is part of a broader trend where famous works of art become the canvas for protests, with food and paint being hurled to raise awareness about various social and environmental issues.

The Mona Lisa, displayed at the Louvre in Paris behind protective glass, remained unharmed by the soup-throwing incident. The protesters aimed to make a statement rather than inflict damage, sparking a debate about the effectiveness and appropriateness of such protests. Public reactions Reactions to the soup-throwing incident varied among museum visitors and officials. French Culture Minister Rachida Dati condemned the act, emphasizing that the Mona Lisa, like cultural heritage, belongs to future generations and should not be targeted. Some visitors expressed anger and disbelief, while others, like a 45-year-old potter named Karine Bertomet, questioned the connection between art and the demand for healthy food. “Yes, I understand the demands a thousand times but, on the other hand, when it comes to the link with art, I don’t see why they target works of art. I really don’t see the link. I’m not shocked for the Mona Lisa, I’m not worried for her, because she’s ultra protected. But then, I don’t see the link with food other than the fact that the Mona Lisa is internationally recognized, so we will definitely hear about this event. But otherwise, I don’t see the connection,” saod Bertomet. Global trend of art-protesting The Mona Lisa is not the only artwork to become a target of unconventional protests. Last year, Van Gogh’s “Sunflowers” faced a tomato soup transformation, while Monet’s “Grainstacks” turned into a canvas for mashed potatoes. Even the beloved Last Supper was not spared, facing climate change protests in the UK. While these protests aim to draw attention to pressing issues such as climate change, sustainable food and societal health, questions arise about their effectiveness. Despite the paintings remaining physically unharmed, property damage and public outrage have become side effects of these protests. Some argue that the strategy is faulty, as disruptive actions may overshadow the causes activists are advocating for. In the realm of unconventional protests, using art as a canvas has become a notable trend. However, the effectiveness and appropriateness of such actions remain subjects of debate. As activists continue to express their concerns through unconventional means, the line between advocacy and property damage becomes increasingly blurred. Like any work of art, the beauty of protests may indeed lie in the eye of the beholder, but the enduring image for many remains that of food strewn across beloved paintings. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost’s views. Read all the Latest News , Trending News , Cricket News , Bollywood News , India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.