Women's entry inside Sabarimala temple: Senior counsel K Parasaran says women do not fall under protection of Article 25(2)(b)

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that all the customary or religious practices, like banning entry of women in the age group of 10-50 years into the famous Sabarimala temple, will have to conform to constitutional principles.

FP Staff July 25, 2018 15:39:47 IST
Women's entry inside Sabarimala temple: Senior counsel K Parasaran says women do not fall under protection of Article 25(2)(b)

Senior counsel K Parasaran on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that women do not fall under the protection of Article 25(2)(b) as the apex court heard the case relating to the entry of women into Sabarimala Temple in Kerala consecutively for the fifth day.

Parasaran said that Article 25(2)(b) is applicable to address caste discrimination because the Article applies only to Hindus. "If it was meant to apply to women also then it should have been applicable to all religions since discrimination against women is there in other religions," he said, according to Bar and Bench.

Continuing his submissions for Nair Service Society, Parasaran said that the right of State to make laws to throw open Hindu Temples to all classes and sections of Hindus does not include women within its scope, according to ANI

Womens entry inside Sabarimala temple Senior counsel K Parasaran says women do not fall under protection of Article 252b

Sabarimala. Reuters

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that all the customary or religious practices, like banning entry of women in the age group of 10-50 years into the famous Sabarimala temple, will have to conform to constitutional principles.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra referred to articles 25 and 26 (Freedom to practice religion) of the Constitution and said that a person can only be restrained on the grounds of "public health, public order and morality".

Senior advocate Raju Ramachandran, who is assisting the court as an amicus curiae, had said that the exclusion of women of that particular age group was akin to untouchability which was prohibited under Article 17 of the Constitution.

The bench, however, was not in agreement with the plea and said that Article 17 (abolition of untouchability) of the Constitution may not be applicable as the women, who are barred from entering, can also belong to upper castes and the provision relates to Scheduled Castes only.

With inputs from PTI

Updated Date:

also read

COVID-19 pandemic offers perfect opportunity to improve India's legal system through disruptive tech, here's why
India

COVID-19 pandemic offers perfect opportunity to improve India's legal system through disruptive tech, here's why

Big data and machine learning can transform how we handle dispute resolution and may do wonders

High Court constitutes 3-member panel under ex-SC judge to probe Manika Batra's allegation of match-fixing
Sports

High Court constitutes 3-member panel under ex-SC judge to probe Manika Batra's allegation of match-fixing

Batra, who was left out of the Indian contingent for the Asian Table Tennis Championships, had moved the court earlier this year alleging that the national coach Soumyadeep Roy pressurised her to throw away an Olympic qualifier match in favour of one of his trainees.

Pakistan Parliament enacts law to give Kulbhushan Jadhav right to file review appeal against his conviction
India

Pakistan Parliament enacts law to give Kulbhushan Jadhav right to file review appeal against his conviction

Jadhav, a 51-year-old retired Indian Navy officer, was sentenced to death by a Pakistani military court on charges of espionage and terrorism in April 2017