'Toolkit' case: Delhi court grants bail to Disha Ravi, calls evidence against climate activist 'scanty and sketchy'
The police have alleged that Ravi was the “editor” of a google doc 'toolkit', which was a guide sheet to stoke 'economic, cultural, social and regional tensions' in India
A Delhi Court on Tuesday granted bail to climate activist Disha Ravi, arrested in the Greta Thunberg 'toolkit' case on 13 February, according to several media reports.
The order was passed by Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana of Patiala House Court Complex, Bar and Bench reported.
The court noted that that there was no reason to breach the rule of bail for a a 22-year-old girl who has absolutely no criminal antecedents considering "the scanty and sketchy evidence", as per Bar and Bench.
The court granted bail on the condition that Ravi furnish two sureties of Rs 1 lakh each, Live Law reported. Advocate Abhinav Sekhri, representing Ravi, requested that the court lower the surety to Rs 50,000, but the court refused, as per Live Law.
Rana had on Saturday reserved orders on Ravi's bail plea.
The police have alleged that Ravi was the “editor” of a google doc (referred to as a "toolkit" by the police), which was allegedly a guide sheet to stoke "economic, cultural, social and regional tensions" in India.
A toolkit is a document created to explain any issue. It also provides information on what one needs to do to address the issue. This might include information about petitions, details about protests, and mass movements.
"... Sedition cannot be invoked to minister to wounded vanity of the government", judge Rana said during the hearing, as per NDTV.
"Even our founding fathers accorded due respect to divergence of opinion by recognising the freedom of speech and expression as an inviolable fundamental right. The right to dissent is firmly enshrined under Article 19 of The Constitution of India," he added.
The judge dismissed Delhi Police's claims Ravi's sharing of the 'toolkit' with teenage Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg amounted to conspiring against the country. "A citizen has the fundamental rights to use the best means of imparting and receiving communication, as long as (it) is permissible... to have access to audiences abroad," the judge further stated, as per the report.
Earlier on Tuesday, Ravi, at the expiry of her one-day police custody, was produced before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Patiala House, as per Bar and Bench.
The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Pankaj Sharma noted that the Delhi Police's plea seeking four more days of police custody of Ravi would be disposed of after the confirmation of bail, as per the report.
During the hearing, Rana stated that mere engagement with people of dubious credentials is not an offience, as per Live Law.
"In the absence of any evidence to the effect that the applicant/accused agreed or shared a common purpose to cause violence on 26.01.2021 with the founders of PJF, it cannot be presumed by resorting to surmises or conjectures that she also supported the secessionist tendencies or the violence caused on 26.01.2021, simply because she shared a platform with people, who have gathered to oppose the legislation. There is not even an iota of evidence brought to my notice connecting the perpetrators of the violence on 26.01.2021 with the said PJF or the applicant/accused," the judge observed, as per the report.
The Delhi Police had on Monday sought five-day custody of the 21-year-old climate activist, but Sharma allowed custodial interrogation of Ravi for one day after police said she was required to be confronted with co-accused Nikita Jacob and Shantanu Muluk.
While Ravi was arrested on 13 February by the Delhi Police, who are probing the "toolkit Google doc" backing the farmers' agitation shared by climate activist Greta Thunberg, Jacob and Muluk have been granted pre-arrest bail by the court.
A senior police officer told news agency PTI that Jacob and Muluk joined the probe in the case on Monday and were being questioned at the Delhi Police's Cyber cell office in Dwarka.
Ravi, on 19 February, was sent to three-day judicial custody by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.
Ravi had last week moved the Delhi High Court seeking that the police be restrained from leaking to the media any material with regard to the FIR against her, after which the court issued notices to the News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA) and a few media houses.
The court had asked the police to file an affidavit containing its submission that it has not leaked any material relating to the investigation to the media.
A Delhi court had sent Ravi to five-day police custody on 14 February after it said her custodial interrogation was required to probe an alleged larger conspiracy against the Government of India and to ascertain her alleged role relating to the Khalistan movement.
Greta Thunberg 'toolkit' case: Bombay HC reserves judgment in Nikita Jacob's bail plea; no arrest till court pronounces verdict
Desai also cited a judgment by Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, in which the court chose to grant a 10-day transit bail to Shantanu Muluk, who is a co-accused in the same case
Disha Ravi arrest: Delhi court directs police to hand over FIR copy to activist, allows her to speak with lawyer, family
Besides the FIR, the court also directed the police to provide her with the copies of the arrest memo and remand paper which was placed to seek her custodial interrogation
Non-bailable warrants were issued against Jacob and Shantanu Muluk for their alleged involvement in preparing the toolkit and being in touch with 'pro-Khalistani elements'