'Tablighis made scapegoats': Bombay HC's stinging remarks on FIRs against foreign attendees

A division bench of Justices TV Nalawade and MG Sewlikar made the observations while quashing the FIRs filed against 29 foreigners, who had attended the event in Delhi

FP Staff August 22, 2020 19:50:48 IST
'Tablighis made scapegoats': Bombay HC's stinging remarks on FIRs against foreign attendees

Punching several holes in the narrative that Tablighi Jamaat attendees were responsible for spreading COVID-19 in India, a division bench of the Bombay High Court has struck down criminal cases registered against 29 foreign Tablighi Jamaat members, media reports said.

The Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court has said that the foreign nationals, who had attended the Tablighi Jamaat event held in Delhi in March this year, are victims of political compulsions and were made "scapegoats" following an "unwarranted propaganda" against them.

A division bench of Justices TV Nalawade and MG Sewlikar noted that while the Maharashtra police acted mechanically in the case, the state government acted under "political compulsion".

The 29 foreign nationals were booked under various provisions of the IPC, the Epidemic Diseases Act, Disaster Management Act and Foreigner's Act for allegedly violating their tourist visa conditions by attending the Tablighi Jamaat congregation held at a Nizamuddin markaz (centre) in the National Capital.

The bench in its order noted that there was a big propaganda against the foreigners who had come to the markaz in Delhi.

"A political government tries to find the scapegoat when there is pandemic or calamity and the circumstances show that there is probability that these foreigners were chosen to make them a scapegoat," the court said in its order.

"There was big propaganda in print media and electronic media against the foreigners who had come to Markaz Delhi and an attempt was made to create a picture that these foreigners were responsible for spreading covid-19 virus in India. There was virtually persecution against these foreigners. The propaganda against the so-called religious activity (Tablighi Jamaat) was unwarranted. The activity was going on for more than 50 years and it is there throughout the year," the bench was quoted as saying by Bar and Bench.

It said that the circumstances and the latest figures of COVID-19 infection in India show that such action against the petitioners should not have been taken.

"It is now high time for the concerned to repent about this action taken against the foreigners and to take some positive steps to repair the damage done by such action," the court said.

In its order, the bench noted that many Muslims from across the world come to India and visit the Nizamuddin markaz (also a mosque) in Delhi as they are attracted to the reform movement of the Tablighi Jamat.

"It is a continuous process and it appears that there are arrangements of stay also made by the Muslims at (the) markaz Delhi," it said. The bench added that the visits of these foreigners to Masjids in India were not prohibited and there is nothing on record to show that this activity is prohibited permanently by the government.

"The activity of Tablighi Jamat got stalled only after the declaration of lockdown in Delhi and till then it was going on," the court said.

The bench further questioned as to whether the people in India are really acting as per the country's great tradition and culture of welcoming guests.

"During the situation created by COVID-19 pandemic, we need to show more tolerance and need to be more sensitive towards our guests, particularly like the present petitioners. Instead of helping them, we lodged them in jails by making allegations that they were responsible for violation of travel documents and that they are responsible for spreading the coronavirus," the court said.

The bench noted that the Maharashtra Police acted mechanically in the matter and the state government acted under "political compulsion".

Slamming the authorities for the propoganda driven action, the court said: "The government cannot give different treatment to citizens of different religions of different countries."

It also noted that the action was unequivocally directed against Muslims alone.

"The record of this matter and the submissions made show that action of Central Government was taken mainly against Muslim persons who had come to Markaz Delhi for Tabligh Jamamat. Similar action was not taken against other foreigners belonging to other religions. Due to these circumstances, the background of the action and what is achieved needs to be considered by the Court."

Apart from the foreign nationals, the Maharashtra Police had also booked six Indian nationals and trustees of masjids which offered shelter to the petitioners. The bench was hearing three separate petitions filed by the accused foreign nationals, who belong to countries like Ghana, Tanzania, Benin and Indonesia.

At the end of the judgement, Justice Sewlikar said that while he agrees with the quashing part of the order, he has differing views on a few observations made by Justice Nalawade. However, he did not specify which observations.

Durign the hearing, the petitioners claimed that they came to India on valid visa in February 2020 and before 10 March, 2020 to experience Indian culture, tradition, hospitality and Indian food.

They claimed that when they arrived in India, they were screened and were let to leave the airport only after they did not show any symptoms of COVID-19. The petitioners further claimed that they were visiting several places in India to observe the religious practices of Muslims.

They claimed that due to lockdown imposed across the country in March, the petitioners, who were in Ahmednagar district at the time, were accommodated in masjids as most lodges and hotels were closed.

They further claimed that while granting visa, there was no prohibition to visit religious places like masjids. The police, while opposing the pleas, said that post-lockdown, announcements were made at public places, asking persons who had attended the Tablighi Jamaat event to come forward voluntarily for testing, but the petitioners did not do so, and created a threat of spreading the coronavirus.

The prosecution further argued that the accused persons were propagating Islam religion among public. The court, however, refused to accept this argument and said there is nothing on record to show that the foreigners (accused persons) were spreading Islam religion by converting persons of other religions to Islam.

The bench further held that no orders were issued by any authority preventing Indians from accommodating persons in masjids or supplying meals to persons, including foreigners.

The Centre had issued individual orders on a case-to-case basis for cancellation of visas and blacklisting of over 2,500 foreign nationals, who had taken part in the Tablighi Jamaat event in Delhi's Nizamuddin area.

In a sweeping action, at least 205 FIRs were lodged against the foreign Tablighi Jamaat members by 11 states and 2,765 such foreigners were blacklisted from visiting India again. The Supreme Court, however, had allowed them to challange their blacklisting in various high courts.

With inputs from PTI

Updated Date:

also read

Muslim nations call for human rights in Afghanistan as Taliban enforces Islamic Sharia laws

Muslim nations call for human rights in Afghanistan as Taliban enforces Islamic Sharia laws

The leaders of the Taliban have insisted that the harsh policies they have implemented in Afghanistan since capturing Kabul in August 2021 are based on Islamic laws

Who is Amira Elghawaby, Canada's first anti-Islamophobia advisor?

Who is Amira Elghawaby, Canada's first anti-Islamophobia advisor?

Amira Elghawaby, an active human rights campaigner, is a columnist for the Toronto Star newspaper. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau praised her appointment as 'an important step in the fight against Islamophobia and hatred in all its forms'

Bankrupt Pakistan going the Sri Lanka way as mass starvation looms

Bankrupt Pakistan going the Sri Lanka way as mass starvation looms

The economic crisis in Pakistan is similar to the levels faced by Sri Lanka, which had gone through a similar situation prior to its default. Pakistan is now at the same juncture