SYL canal issue: Haryana govt moves Supreme Court seeking early hearing; bench asks to list matter at apex court registry

On 11 July, the apex court said it was obligatory for Punjab and Haryana to respect and execute its orders on the SYL canal issue. The controversial 1981 water-sharing agreement came into being after Haryana was carved out of Punjab in 1966

Press Trust of India July 25, 2018 11:47:37 IST
SYL canal issue: Haryana govt moves Supreme Court seeking early hearing; bench asks to list matter at apex court registry

New Delhi: The Haryana government on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court seeking an early hearing in the matter related to its row with Punjab over the Satluj-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal.

SYL canal issue Haryana govt moves Supreme Court seeking early hearing bench asks to list matter at apex court registry

Representational image. PTI

The matter was mentioned before a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud. The bench asked Haryana's counsel to approach the apex court registry for listing of the matter before an appropriate bench. The apex court had earlier granted the Centre time to explore the possibility of an amicable solution to the SYL canal row between Punjab and Haryana.

On 11 July, the apex court said it was obligatory for Punjab and Haryana to respect and execute its orders on the SYL canal issue. The controversial 1981 water-sharing agreement came into being after Haryana was carved out of Punjab in 1966. For effective allocation of water, the SYL canal link was conceptualised and both states were required to construct their portions within their territories.

Haryana constructed the portion of SYL canal in its territory. However, Punjab, after the initial phase, stopped the work, leading to a spate of litigations. In 2004, the Congress government in the state came out with the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act with the intention to terminate the 1981 agreement and all other pacts relating to sharing waters of the Ravi and Beas rivers.

The apex court had first decreed Haryana's suit in 2002 asking Punjab to honour its commitments with regard to water sharing in the case. Punjab had challenged the verdict by filing an original suit that was rejected in 2004 by the Supreme Court which asked the Centre to take over the remaining infrastructure work of the SYL canal project.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Sunil Gavaskar says he would love to see Sourav Ganguly carry on as BCCI chief till 2023 World Cup
First Cricket News

Sunil Gavaskar says he would love to see Sourav Ganguly carry on as BCCI chief till 2023 World Cup

Gavaskar feels Ganguly will be able to lead the cricket board with as much competence as he showed while leading the cricket team.

SC reserves order on plea seeking transfer of money collected by PM-CARES Fund to NDRF
India

SC reserves order on plea seeking transfer of money collected by PM-CARES Fund to NDRF

Dushyant Dave, appearing for NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation, said that the creation of the PM-CARES Fund contravenes provisions of the Disaster Management Act

Sushant Singh Rajput death: Rhea Chakraborty moves SC, seeks transfer of probe from Patna to Mumbai
India

Sushant Singh Rajput death: Rhea Chakraborty moves SC, seeks transfer of probe from Patna to Mumbai

Sushant Singh Rajput's father KK Singh had lodged a police complaint in Patna against Rhea Chakraborty, accusing her of abetting the actor's suicide.