Supreme Court to Army: No 'excessive and retaliatory force' in Manipur

The Supreme Court on Friday said the army and paramilitary forces cannot use 'excessive and retaliatory force' in Manipur and such instances must be probed. A bench of Justices M B Lokur and U U Lalit (retired) also asked the amicus curiae to furnish details of alleged fake encounters in Manipur.

IANS July 27, 2016 17:34:05 IST
Supreme Court to Army: No 'excessive and retaliatory force' in Manipur

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday said the army and paramilitary forces cannot use 'excessive and retaliatory force' in Manipur and such instances must be probed. A bench of Justices M B Lokur and U U Lalit (retired) also asked the amicus curiae to furnish details of alleged fake encounters in Manipur.

The bench said it was open to the Army to conduct its own inquiries into the allegations of fake encounters in Manipur while also adding that it will examine the claim of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) that the latter was a "toothless tiger" and needed more powers.

Supreme Court to Army No excessive and retaliatory force in Manipur

Supreme Court. AFP

The apex court was hearing a petition by one Suresh Singh seeking repeal of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act that grants special powers to the Indian Armed Forces in "disturbed areas".

Earlier, the court had said the fact that compensation had been paid to the kin of victims of encounter killings by security forces in Manipur "amply indicate" that such encounters were fake.

It had asked Manipur government to apprise the court of the steps taken after compensations were paid to the kith and kin of the deceased.

The court had then also asked the Centre, Manipur government and NHRC to submit a comprehensive report on alleged fake encounter cases in the state, including 62 such cases where even FIRs are yet to be lodged.

Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for Extra Judicial Execution Victims' Families Association, had said "in all these 62 cases, not a single FIR has been lodged against any of the accused."

The bench had also asked Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh, representing the Centre, and lawyers of NHRC and the state government to provide requisite information to the amicus curiae, who will prepare a comprehensive chart of cases for the perusal of court.

The erstwhile UPA government had earlier told the apex court that findings of the Supreme Court-appointed panel's report on extra-judicial killings in Manipur had been examined at the highest level.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Fresh twist in Tata-Mistry tussle: Hours after SC orders status quo on shares, SP group says 'time to separate'
Business

Fresh twist in Tata-Mistry tussle: Hours after SC orders status quo on shares, SP group says 'time to separate'

This development comes just hours after the Supreme Court restrained till 28 October the SP group and Cyrus Mistry from pledging or transferring their shares in Tata Sons Pvt Ltd

SC rejects SBI plea for resuming insolvency proceedings against Anil Ambani; matter listed for 6 Oct
Business

SC rejects SBI plea for resuming insolvency proceedings against Anil Ambani; matter listed for 6 Oct

The State Bank of India had moved the apex court to recover Rs 1,200 crore that it had loaned to two firms of the then-chairman of Reliance Communications

'Insidious and rabid': SC stays Sudarshan TV from broadcasting 'UPSC jihad' show, calls on media to self-regulate
India

'Insidious and rabid': SC stays Sudarshan TV from broadcasting 'UPSC jihad' show, calls on media to self-regulate

The apex court said the manner in which some media houses are conducting debates is cause for concern as all type of defamatory things are being said