Supreme Court says interference in judicial system 'doesn’t augur well', holds that appointment, transfer of judges pivotal to judiciary's independence

The Supreme Court on Monday said that the appointment and transfer of judges are pivotal to the administration of justice and any interference does not augur well for the institution.

Press Trust of India September 23, 2019 13:50:56 IST
Supreme Court says interference in judicial system 'doesn’t augur well', holds that appointment, transfer of judges pivotal to judiciary's independence
  • The apex court made the observations after it decided to keep the plea of the Gujarat High Court Advocate Association pending

  • The petition had sought a direction to the Centre to implement the recommendations of the Supreme Court's Collegium with regard to transfer of Bombay High Court judge Justice Akil Kureshi

  • The Supreme Court's Collegium is headed by Gogoi

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday said that the appointment and transfer of judges are pivotal to the administration of justice and any interference does not augur well for the institution.

Supreme Court says interference in judicial system doesnt augur well holds that appointment transfer of judges pivotal to judiciarys independence

File image of the Supreme Court. Reuters

A bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice SA Bobde and Justice S Abdul Nazeer also recorded that matters of appointment, posting and transfer of judges is an aspect of independence of the judiciary.

The apex court made the observations after it decided to keep the plea of the Gujarat High Court Advocate Association pending in which it had sought a direction to the Centre to implement the recommendations of the Supreme Court's Collegium with regard to transfer of Bombay High Court judge Justice Akil Kureshi.

The Supreme Court's Collegium headed by Gogoi had earlier recommended to the Centre to appoint Justice Kureshi as the Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Later, it recommended he be appointed as Chief Justice of the Tripura High Court.

"Appointments and transfers go to the root of the administration of justice and where judicial review is severely restricted. Interference in system of administration of justice does not augur well for the institution," it said while keeping the plea of bar body pending.

Updated Date:

also read

Explained: What Supreme Court’s historic order on sedition law means for those on trial
India

Explained: What Supreme Court’s historic order on sedition law means for those on trial

While temporarily suspending the colonial-era sedition law, the Supreme Court said that those already booked under Section 124A of the IPC and are in jail can approach the courts for bail

Centre may amend sedition law instead of revoking it: Mahua Moitra
Politics

Centre may amend sedition law instead of revoking it: Mahua Moitra

Her comment came a day after Supreme Court in a landmark order put on hold the controversial sedition law till the Centre completes a promised review of the colonial relic and also asked the central and state governments not to register any fresh case invoking the act

Supreme Court puts sedition law on hold: A look back at cases that shook the nation
India

Supreme Court puts sedition law on hold: A look back at cases that shook the nation

The colonial-era sedition law has been invoked against the likes of author Arundhati Roy, student leaders Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, and cartoonist Aseem Trivedi among others