Supreme Court reserves verdict on pleas for live streaming of court proceedings, plans on concept of open courts

The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas related to the issue of live streaming of court proceedings.

Press Trust of India August 24, 2018 14:06:22 IST
Supreme Court reserves verdict on pleas for live streaming of court proceedings, plans on concept of open courts

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas related to the issue of live streaming of court proceedings.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud said it would pass appropriate orders after Attorney General KK Venugopal suggested that live streaming of the important cases in the Chief Justice's court can be started on a pilot basis. The Attorney General said the process can be adopted in other court rooms depending on the success of the pilot project.

Supreme Court reserves verdict on pleas for live streaming of court proceedings plans on concept of open courts

File image of Supreme Court. Reuters

During the hearing, one of the lawyers present in the courtroom opposed the suggestion of live streaming, saying this will have an implication on the administration of justice and also lead to "spreading of fake news". The top court, however, said that it aims to implement the concept of open courts which in turn would help reducing the crowd in the court. It said live streaming may also be a help for academic purposes.

The apex court had earlier termed the proposal of live streaming of the court proceedings as the "need of the hour". A petition, filed by a law student, had sought a direction for setting up live streaming rooms within the apex court premises and granting access to legal interns.

The plea, filed by Swapnil Tripathi, a student of National Law University in Jodhpur, had sought requisite guidelines to facilitate witnessing of the proceedings for interns. Senior advocate Indira Jaising had also filed a PIL for video-recording of proceedings in matters of national importance. Besides Jaising and Tripathi, NGO Centre For Accountability and Systemic Change, through its lawyer Virag Gupta, had also filed a PIL seeking a direction to the apex court registry and the Ministries of Law and Justice and Electronics and Information Technology to "video record the proceedings of all the courts and make them available to public and parties, subject to regulations".

Earlier, the Centre had said that video recording and live streaming of judicial proceedings can be undertaken on a trial basis in constitutional matters being heard by the Chief Justice of India's court.

Updated Date:

also read

SC stays NGT orders imposing fines on NOIDA authority, Delhi Jal Board over untreated sewage
India

SC stays NGT orders imposing fines on NOIDA authority, Delhi Jal Board over untreated sewage

The supreme court stayed the National Green Tribunal order imposing a fine of Rs 100 crore on NOIDA for failing to prevent untreated sewage from flowing into the Kondli irrigation canal, and a Rs 50 crore fine on the Delhi Jal Board for the release of untreated sewage in the Yamuna

Andhra HC cannot be 'town planner', says SC on high court order for building state capital in six months
India

Andhra HC cannot be 'town planner', says SC on high court order for building state capital in six months

A bench of Justices KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna also stayed time-bound directions issued by the high court, including the one that said the state will construct and develop Amaravati capital city and capital region within six months

Supreme Court asks Centre to respond on pleas seeking recognition of same sex marriages
India

Supreme Court asks Centre to respond on pleas seeking recognition of same sex marriages

The pleas seek direction seeking recognition of the marriage of two gay couples under the Special Marriage Act