Supreme Court refers plea seeking ban on female genital mutilation to five-judge constitution bench

A three-judge bench, headed by CJI Dipak Misra, of Supreme Court observed that it would refer the case of female genital mutilation to a five-judge Constitution bench. Sunita Tiwari, the petitioner, had earlier sought a direction to the respondents.

Asian News International September 24, 2018 21:45:03 IST
Supreme Court refers plea seeking ban on female genital mutilation to five-judge constitution bench

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday referred the petition seeking a ban on the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) to a five-judge Constitution bench.

"We are referring the case to a five-judge Constitution bench," a three-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra and also comprising Justice AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud observed.

The petitioner, Sunita Tiwari had earlier sought a direction to the respondents to implement the resolutions passed in December 2012, by the United Nations General Assembly banning female genital mutilation or Khatna of minor girls in the Dawoodi Bohra Muslim community, in which India is a signatory.

She also sought a direction to put a complete ban on the illegal and inhuman practices of FGM as the same was violating the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 39 of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) of the Constitution of India.

Updated Date:

also read

Famous 5: The women judges in the US Supreme Court who made history before Ketanji Brown Jackson
World

Famous 5: The women judges in the US Supreme Court who made history before Ketanji Brown Jackson

Ketanji Brown Jackson becomes the first Black woman to serve as a judge in the US Supreme Court. With this, she will be joining the esteemed club of Sandra Day O'Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett

Profound impact of a conservative US Supreme Court
World

Profound impact of a conservative US Supreme Court

Analysts say the just-closed annual court season has revealed a set of judges more hard-line than anyone anticipated. They have brashly tossed out the decisions of their predecessors, including, as with abortion, rights that previous courts said were guaranteed by the constitution

Powers under preventive detention law 'exceptional', cannot be exercised in routine manner, says SC
India

Powers under preventive detention law 'exceptional', cannot be exercised in routine manner, says SC

The apex court observation came as it set aside the October last year order of detention of two persons in Telangana