Hathras victim's body hastily cremated to avoid violence, says UP govt; SC questions state on witness protection
The state government in an affidavit further recommended a CBI probe into the case as it would obviate hindrance being created by certain 'vested interests' in the fair and impartial investigation
The Uttar Pradesh government on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the body of the 19-year-old Dalit woman, who was brutally tortured and gang-raped allegedly by four upper-caste men in Hathras district, was cremated at night to avoid “large-scale violence”.
The apex court, terming the rape as 'horrible', directed the Uttar Pradesh government to inform it by 8 October about the steps taken to protect witnesses, as per PTI.
The state government said that despite its “diligent probe” into the Hathras case, “different false narratives started gaining momentum at the behest of some vested interests”.
The Yogi Adityanath government in an affidavit further recommended a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the case as it would obviate hindrance being created by certain vested interests in the fair and impartial investigation.
The state government said an investigation by the Central agency in the case will “ensure that no vested interests will be able to create a fake and false narrative with oblique motives”
The affidavit said the state government has already requested the Central government to take over the investigation through CBI.
In the affidavit to the apex court, the state also claimed the victim’s family was present for the cremation and “agreed to attend to avoid further violence”, Indian Express reported.
As per NDTV, the state government justified the 2.30 am cremation by saying there was a high alert in the district because of the Babri mosque verdict a day later and coronavirus safety rules. The cremation was performed with “full rites and customs” at night only to maintain law and order, the affidavit claimed.
It told the Supreme Court that the district administration of Hathras had been receiving “several intelligence inputs since the morning of 29 September of the manner in which the dharna had taken place at Safdarjung hospital and the whole issue was being exploited and a caste/communal colour was being given”.
The state claimed it had received specific inputs that lakhs of protestors of both communities/castes along with supporters of political parties and media would assemble the next morning at the village “which is likely to turn violent and will lead to major law and order problems”, reported NDTV.
'Inform on steps to protect witnesses'
The apex court directed the Yogi Adityanath government to file an affidavit regarding and also ascertain whether the victim's family has chosen a lawyer, as per PTI.
A bench comprising Chief Justice SA Bobde and justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian said it will ensure that the investigation is smooth.
The top court also told all parties appearing before it to give suggestions on the scope of proceedings before the Allahabad High Court and how the apex court can make it more relevant.
Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for few intervenors, asked the top court to provide protection to the victim's family.
Jaising said the family has expressed that they are not satisfied with the CBI taking up the case and said an SIT, monitored by the apex court, should probe the case.
At this point, the bench asked Jaising what her locus standi was.
“You don't have any locus in this matter. But we are hearing you because the case is such and of huge importance. We are hearing your because this a shocking incident, but we are still pondering over your locus in this case," said the bench.
Advocate Kirti Singh, appearing for few woman lawyers, said the probe should be under the supervision of the court.
The apex court said this is a horrible incident but it does not want repetitive arguments in court.
“It is horrible incident but the question is how many similar arguments should we hear? Please understand that there is no need to duplicate concerns in the court of law," the bench said.
“Court of law need not hear the same argument by every party. This is not a comment on the incident but please understand our point of view,” it added, as per PTI.
SIT visits crime scene
Meanwhile, a Special Investigation Team investigating the case, visited the crime scene on Tuesday morning. The panel, formed by the Yogi Adityanath government, will submit its report on Wednesday.
The state government has also sought a CBI probe into the FIR related to the alleged criminal conspiracy to spread caste conflict, instigating violence, incidents of vicious propaganda by sections of media and political interests.
On Monday, chief minister Yogi Adityanath accused the Bharatiya Janata Party’s political opponents of attempting to conspire against it by “trying to lay a foundation for caste and communal riots through international funding”, reported ANI.
The state government filed an FIR against unknown persons for attempting to trigger 'caste-baste conflict'.
The Dalit teen died of grievous injuries in a Delhi hospital on 29 September, a fortnight after she was gang-raped allegedly at her village by four upper-caste men.
With inputs from PTI
Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.
Besides the alleged gang-rape case, the Uttar Pradesh government has also sought a CBI probe into the FIR related to the alleged criminal conspiracy to spread caste conflict
Hathras gangrape: UP govt requests SC to monitor CBI probe, says 'three-fold protection' given to victim's family
In an affidavit filed in the top court, the state government has said that it has deployed adequate security forces to the victim’s family and witnesses to 'ensure free and fair investigation'
Hathras gangrape: SC seeks govt reply over witness protection; ex-BJP MLA booked over 'justice for accused' meet
Accusing the Yogi Adityanath government of trying to cover-up the crime with its affidavit in the SC, the Congress said the annexures in the affidavit were copied from the 'Black Lives movement in US'