Supreme Court likely to pronounce verdict on plea challenging adultery law today; Centre favoured retention of Section 497

On 5 January, the Supreme Court had referred to a five-judge Constitution bench the plea challenging the validity of the penal law on adultery.

Press Trust of India September 26, 2018 23:51:46 IST
Supreme Court likely to pronounce verdict on plea challenging adultery law today; Centre favoured retention of Section 497

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is likely to pronounce on Thursday its judgement on pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the penal law on adultery.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra on 8 August had reserved its verdict after Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand, appearing for the Centre, concluded her arguments.

Supreme Court likely to pronounce verdict on plea challenging adultery law today Centre favoured retention of Section 497

File image of the Supreme Court of India. AP

The hearing, which commenced on 1 August, by the bench also comprised justices RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, went on for six days.

The Centre had favoured retention of penal law on adultery, saying that it is a public wrong which causes mental and physical injury to the spouse, children and the family.

"It is an action willingly and knowingly done with the knowledge that it would hurt the spouse, the children and the family. Such intentional action which impinges on the sanctity of marriage and sexual fidelity encompassed in marriage, which forms the backbone of the Indian society, has been classified and defined by the Indian State as a criminal offence in exercise of its Constitution powers," the Centre had said.

Section 497 of the 158-year-old Indian Penal Code says: "Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery."

On 5 January, the apex court had referred to a five-judge Constitution bench the plea challenging the validity of the penal law on adultery.

The court had taken a prima facie view that though the criminal law proceeded on "gender neutrality", the concept was absent in Section 497.

Updated Date:

also read

Why Collegium needs urgent reform: Judiciary should be independent as well as accountable
Opinion

Why Collegium needs urgent reform: Judiciary should be independent as well as accountable

One hopes the current confrontation between the executive and the judiciary proves to be a blessing in disguise and ushers in much-needed progressive reforms in the judiciary

US states take control of abortion debate with funding focus
World

US states take control of abortion debate with funding focus

When the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year and gave control of abortion policy to the states, it led to bans and restrictions in some states, and executive orders and laws protecting access in others

Explained: Why kids in Italy have the legal right not to see their grandparents
Explainers

Explained: Why kids in Italy have the legal right not to see their grandparents

In Italy, parents of two children appealed against the decision of a lower court which had forced the youngsters to spend time with their grandparents. Now, the top court has said that this is not an obligation