Supreme Court dismisses PIL against appointment of former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana as DG civil aviation security

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi refused to entertain the plea filed by lawyer M L Sharma challenging Asthana's appointment in Bureau of Civil Aviation Security

Press Trust of India January 31, 2019 11:43:38 IST
Supreme Court dismisses PIL against appointment of former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana as DG civil aviation security
  • A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi refused to entertain the plea filed by lawyer M L Sharma challenging Asthana's appointment

  • The Delhi High Court on 11 January had refused to quash the FIR lodged against Asthana on bribery allegations

  • The government on 18 January, however, appointed Asthana as director of Bureau of Civil Aviation Security

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a PIL challenging the appointment of former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana as director general of the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS).

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi refused to entertain the plea filed by lawyer M L Sharma challenging Asthana's appointment in BCAS.

Supreme Court dismisses PIL against appointment of former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana as DG civil aviation security

File photo of Rakesh Asthana. PTI

The Delhi High Court on 11 January had refused to quash the FIR lodged against Asthana on bribery allegations and set a 10-week deadline to complete the investigation.

The government on 18 January, however, appointed Asthana as director of BCAS, India's regulatory authority for civil aviation security.

The plea had said the appointment was in contradiction to the law and Asthana be suspended in view of the pending investigation against him.

It alleged that Asthana was under investigation for taking bribes within his duty and his appointment is contradictory to the Classification, Control and Appeal (CCA) Rules 1965.

The plea said: "Instead of suspension within the CCA rule-1965, Asthana has been promoted and appointed as chief of BCAS by during the pendency of the investigation under Delhi High Court in a FIR for bribe and corruption in his official duty".

"This has created a serious injury to the judicial and public office systems violating Articles 21 and 14 and destruction of faith in the three constitutional office of the country," it said.

Asthana was booked on allegations of criminal conspiracy, corruption and criminal misconduct under the relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Asthana, a Gujarat cadre IPS officer was at loggerheads with his boss former CBI Director Alok Verma for several months and both of them had levelled charges of corruption against each other.

The petition also sought framing of a suitable guideline in case of termination of service of the CBI director saying that prime minister cannot take part in the deliberations due to conflict of interest.

The CBI Director is appointed by a high-powered Selection Committee comprising the prime minister, the CJI and the leader of largest opposition party.

"Instead of suspension, Asthana's appointment as BCAS chief on January 18 is a clear case of personal interest of PM Modi in favour of Asthana and against Verma. Therefore, PM Modi have no legal and moral right to sit as member of the committee in which Asthana Vs Verma case has been decided," it said.

In a controversial order on 23 October, 2018, the government had divested the powers of Verma and Asthana sending them on forced leave as both had accused each other of corruption.

Updated Date:

also read

Supreme Court imposes Rs 8 lakh fine on two advocates for 'misadventure'
India

Supreme Court imposes Rs 8 lakh fine on two advocates for 'misadventure'

The lawyers had filed a plea on the issue of traffic density, air pollution and emission norms

Delhi HC fines former CBI director over plea to restore Twitter verification tag
India

Delhi HC fines former CBI director over plea to restore Twitter verification tag

The petitioner had moved against the micro blogging site Twitter for removing verified tag from his account

Marital rape: How understanding ‘context’ rather than just focusing on ‘consent’ will help resolve the issue
Opinion

Marital rape: How understanding ‘context’ rather than just focusing on ‘consent’ will help resolve the issue

It’s time we clear the ambiguity over the issue of ‘marital rape’. Either we decide to acknowledge it and make it a criminal offence, or we decide to exempt it from judicial scrutiny is a choice that the legislature and judiciary have to make