Supreme Court declines to stay amendments to SC/ST Act; CJI to decide if review petitions, pleas are to be heard together

The Supreme Court today declined to stay amendments in the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

FP Staff January 24, 2019 13:13:01 IST
Supreme Court declines to stay amendments to SC/ST Act; CJI to decide if review petitions, pleas are to be heard together
  • No interim orders can be passed in the matter, the Supreme Court said

  • CJI will decide if review petitions and pleas against the amendments should be heard together

  • The Centre said that the review petition against the 2018 SC verdict should be decided first

Asserting that no interim orders can be passed in the matter, the Supreme Court today declined to stay amendments in the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

A three-judge bench, headed by Justice AK Sikri, also said that the Chief Justice of India will decide if review petitions and pleas against the amendments should be heard together.

Attorney General KK Venugopal said that the review petition against the 2018 Supreme Court verdict should be decided first.

Supreme Court declines to stay amendments to SCST Act CJI to decide if review petitions pleas are to be heard together

File image of the Supreme Court. AP

In August 2018, the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha had passed a bill which sought the overturn on the Supreme Court order that struck down the provision for an immediate arrest of a person booked under the SC/ST Act. A petition was also filed by two senior lawyers around this time, which sought that amendments to the Act be declared null and void.

The 20 March, 2018 Supreme Court order, passed by a bench led by Justice AK Goel, also incorporated the provision for a preliminary inquiry into the case, to deal with the Act’s misuse against government servants. The order also stated that a public servant can be arrested only after approval by a competent authority.

The bill passed by the two Houses of the Parliament, on the other hand, held that anyone booked under the Act cannot apply for anticipatory bail.

The Centre had justified the amendments and said that the Parliament had the power to take this decision, the aim of which is to protect marginally weaker sections of the society from atrocities.

Updated Date:

also read

Dharmendra Pradhan slams Rahul Gandhi's NEET postponement demand, calls him 'pseudo expert'
India

Dharmendra Pradhan slams Rahul Gandhi's NEET postponement demand, calls him 'pseudo expert'

The minister's response came after the former Congress president called for the postponement of the NEET examination as many other examinations are scheduled around 12 September

Surveillance, silence and surprise: How TMC stole Babul Supriyo from BJP's stable
Politics

Surveillance, silence and surprise: How TMC stole Babul Supriyo from BJP's stable

Supriyo had differences with BJP since the day he was dropped as a Union minister

SC slams Centre for 'cherry-picking' names for tribunals, directs govt to make appointments in two weeks
India

SC slams Centre for 'cherry-picking' names for tribunals, directs govt to make appointments in two weeks

There are around 250 posts lying vacant in various key tribunals and appellate tribunals