Supreme Court declares Aadhaar constitutionally valid, with some riders: Full text of the judgment

Observing that Aadhaar was meant to help the benefits reach the marginalised sections of society, it said the scheme takes into account the dignity of people not only from personal but from the community point of view as well and served the much bigger public interest.

FP Staff September 26, 2018 14:39:30 IST
Supreme Court declares Aadhaar constitutionally valid, with some riders: Full text of the judgment

The Supreme Court Wednesday declared the Centre's flagship Aadhaar scheme as constitutionally valid but struck down some of its provisions including its linking with bank accounts, mobile phones and school admissions.

Supreme Court declares Aadhaar constitutionally valid with some riders Full text of the judgment

Representational image. News18

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra held that while Aadhaar would remain mandatory for filing of IT returns and allotment of Permanent Account Number (PAN), it would not be mandatory to link Aadhaar to bank accounts and the telecom service providers cannot seek its linking for mobile connections.

It would not be mandatory for school admissions, as also for the examinations conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Examination, National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for medical entrance and the University Grants Commission.

The bench also struck down the national security exception under the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016.

Observing that Aadhaar was meant to help the benefits reach the marginalised sections of society, it said the scheme takes into account the dignity of people not only from personal but from the community point of view as well and served the much bigger public interest. Aadhaar means unique and it is better to be unique than being best, it said.

Three sets of judgements were pronounced in the matter. The first one was pronounced by Justice AK Sikri who wrote the judgement for himself, the CJI and Justice AM Khanwilkar.  Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Ashok Bhushan, who were also part of the bench, wrote their individual opinions. Here is the complete judgment.

Supreme Court judgment on Aadhaar by Firstpost on Scribd

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Cash flows free as Conservatives, Liberals battle to fill US Supreme Court seat left vacant by Ginsburg's death
World

Cash flows free as Conservatives, Liberals battle to fill US Supreme Court seat left vacant by Ginsburg's death

Confirmation of a conservative jurist to succeed Ginsburg, who passed away on Saturday, could cement a right-leaning ideology on the nation’s highest court for decades to come, providing Trump with a lasting legacy whether he wins reelection or not

Centre using sedition law to curb free speech, says former Supreme Court justice MB Lokur
India

Centre using sedition law to curb free speech, says former Supreme Court justice MB Lokur

Speaking on the contempt of court issue related to lawyer Prashant Bhushan, the former apex court judge said his statements were misread

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg, second woman to serve on US Supreme Court, became an unlikely cultural icon
World

How Ruth Bader Ginsburg, second woman to serve on US Supreme Court, became an unlikely cultural icon

Ginsburg's late-life rock stardom could not remotely have been predicted in June 1993, when President Bill Clinton nominated her to the Supreme Court