Supreme Court cancels 29 January Ayodhya land dispute hearing due to non-availability of Justice SA Bobde

The five-judge bench hearing the Ayodhya case was reconstituted on 25 January as Justice UU Lalit, who was a member of the original bench, had recused himself from hearing the matter.

Press Trust of India January 28, 2019 08:34:38 IST
Supreme Court cancels 29 January Ayodhya land dispute hearing due to non-availability of Justice SA Bobde
  • The top court was scheduled to meet on Tuesday to hear the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid land title dispute case

  • The hearing stands cancelled as Justice SA Bobde will not be available on the day

  • The five-judge bench was reconstituted after Justice UU Lalit, who was a member of the original bench, recused himself from hearing the matter

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Sunday cancelled the 29 January hearing in the politically-sensitive Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid land title dispute case as one member of the five-judge Constitution Bench will not be available then.

The sitting of the Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi stands cancelled as Justice SA Bobde will not be available on 29 January, as per a notice issued by the Supreme Court registry.

"Take notice that due to non availability of Justice SA Bobde on 29 January, 2019 (Tuesday), sitting of Constitution Bench in Chief Justice's court, comprising the Chief Justice, justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, stands cancelled.

Supreme Court cancels 29 January Ayodhya land dispute hearing due to nonavailability of Justice SA Bobde

File image of the Supreme Court of India. PTI

"Therefore, the Constitution Bench matter will not be taken up for hearing," the notice stated.

The five-judge bench was reconstituted on 25 January as Justice UU Lalit, who was a member of the original bench, had recused himself from hearing the matter. When the new bench was constituted, Justice NV Ramana was also excluded from the new Constitution Bench.

No reason was cited for the exclusion of Justice Ramana in the new Constitution Bench.

Besides the CJI, the new bench comprises justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer.

In the fresh bench, justices Bhushan and Nazeer made a come back to hear the matter.

Both of them were part of an earlier bench headed by then CJI Dipak Misra (now retired). It had, on 27 September, 2018, refused to refer to a five-judge Constitution Bench the reconsideration of the observation in its 1994 judgment that a mosque was not integral to Islam.

While Misra and Bhushan had said it has to find out the context in which the five-judge bench had delivered the 1994 judgment, Justice Nazeer had given a minority verdict disagreeing with the two judges.

Nazeer had said whether a mosque is integral to Islam has to be decided considering religious belief which requires detailed consideration.

On 10 January, Justice Lalit had recused himself after expressing disinclination to participate in the hearing any further as he had appeared as a lawyer for former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Kalyan Singh in a related matter "sometime in the year 1997".

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among three parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

On 10 January, the bench, in its order, had noted that the apex court registry's secretary general has informed the CJI that in four suits, out of which these appeals have arisen, in all 120 issues have been framed for trial and a total of 88 witnesses were examined.

It had noted that depositions of witnesses run into 13,886 pages and a total of 257 documents exhibited.

Updated Date:

also read

High Court constitutes 3-member panel under ex-SC judge to probe Manika Batra's allegation of match-fixing
Sports

High Court constitutes 3-member panel under ex-SC judge to probe Manika Batra's allegation of match-fixing

Batra, who was left out of the Indian contingent for the Asian Table Tennis Championships, had moved the court earlier this year alleging that the national coach Soumyadeep Roy pressurised her to throw away an Olympic qualifier match in favour of one of his trainees.

SC to hear plea seeking direction to CBSE for maintaining original results on 6 December
Education

SC to hear plea seeking direction to CBSE for maintaining original results on 6 December

The plea stated that the petitioners have been either declared failed or awarded very less marks in the improvement examinations

'Trial in 99% of POCSO cases was still pending by December 2020'
India

'Trial in 99% of POCSO cases was still pending by December 2020'

According to a study, 42 percent of the total rape cases were committed against children below 18 years in 2020, compared to 47 percent in 2018 and 45 percent in 2019