Sohrabuddin Shaikh case: Plea by lawyers' body in Bombay HC questions CBI decision not to challenge Amit Shah's discharge

A city-based lawyers' association on Friday filed a public interest litigation in the Bombay High Court against the CBI decision not to challenge a lower court order discharging BJP president Amit Shah in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh fake encounter case.

PTI January 19, 2018 18:40:09 IST
Sohrabuddin Shaikh case: Plea by lawyers' body in Bombay HC questions CBI decision not to challenge Amit Shah's discharge

Mumbai: A city-based lawyers' association on Friday filed a public interest litigation in the Bombay High Court against the CBI decision not to challenge a lower court order discharging BJP president Amit Shah in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh fake encounter case.

In the PIL, the Bombay Lawyers Association urged the high court to issue a direction to the CBI to file a revision application challenging the sessions court order discharging Shah.

The petitioner's lawyer Ahmad Abidi said the plea would be mentioned before a division bench of justices SC Dharmadhikari and Bharti Dangre on 22 January.

Sohrabuddin Shaikh case Plea by lawyers body in Bombay HC questions CBI decision not to challenge Amit Shahs discharge

File image of Amit Shah. PTI

"The CBI is a premier investigating agency. It has public duty to observe the rule of law in its action but it has miserably failed," the petition said.

It submitted that the trial court had similarly discharged two Rajasthan Police Sub Inspectors Himanshu Singh and Shyam Singh Charan and senior Gujarat Police officer NK Amin.

"The petitioner has learnt that the CBI has challenged their discharge before the high court. This act of the CBI in challenging discharge of the accused persons on selective basis is arbitrary and unreasonable, rather malafide," it alleged.

The petition said that the Supreme Court, while transferring the trial in the case from Gujarat to Mumbai, had ordered that it to be concluded expeditiously.

"The Supreme Court had said the administrative committee of the high court would assign the case to a court where the trial may be concluded judiciously, in accordance with the law, and without any delay. The administrative committee would also ensure that the trial should be conducted from beginning to end by the same officer, the apex court had said in its order," it said.

Sohrabuddin Shaikh, alleged to be a terrorist, was killed in an alleged fake encounter by the Gujarat and Rajasthan police along with his wife Kauser Bi and his associate Tulsi Prajapati in 2005.

The CBI took over the probe into the case in February 2010 and filed its charge sheet in July the same year against 23 accused including Amit Shah, who at that time was the minister of state for home in Gujarat.

The trial court over a period of time discharged several accused in the case, including three IPS officers.

Updated Date:

also read

Bombay High Court rejects Tarun Tejpal's application for in-camera hearing
India

Bombay High Court rejects Tarun Tejpal's application for in-camera hearing

The former editor-in-chief of Tehelka magazine stands accused of sexually assaulting his then woman colleague in the lift of a five-star hotel in Goa in November 2013

Shakti Mills gang-rape: Bombay HC sets aside death penalty 8 years later; a look at the case
India

Shakti Mills gang-rape: Bombay HC sets aside death penalty 8 years later; a look at the case

In August 2013, a 22-year-old photojournalist was gang-raped inside Shakti Mills in Mumbai. Later, an eighteen-year-old call centre employee reported that she too had been gang-raped, on 31 July 2013, inside the same mills complex.

Shakti Mills gang-rape case: Bombay HC sets aside death penalty, sends three accused to life imprisonment
India

Shakti Mills gang-rape case: Bombay HC sets aside death penalty, sends three accused to life imprisonment

The trio, through their lawyer, had told the court the death sentence violated their fundamental right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution