Should netas with criminal records be allowed to contest elections? Supreme Court dismisses PIL, tells petitioner to approach EC

The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation seeking that it direct the Election Commission not to allow any member of a political party with criminal antecedent to contest elections.

FP Staff January 21, 2019 12:20:11 IST
Should netas with criminal records be allowed to contest elections? Supreme Court dismisses PIL, tells petitioner to approach EC
  • The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, asked the petitioner to approach the Election Commission of India with his plea.

  • The court came to the decision after hearing a petition by BJP spokesperson and advocate Ashwini Upadhyay.

  • The plea also asked the Supreme Court to ensure that parties do not field history-sheeters as candidates during elections.

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Election Commission to not allow any member of a political party with criminal antecedent to contest elections.

However, the bench, led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, asked the petitioner, BJP spokesperson and advocate Ashwini Upadhyay, to approach the Election Commission with his plea, reported LiveLaw.

In his petition, Upadhyay had also asked the Supreme Court to ensure that parties do not field history-sheeters as candidates during elections and issue directions on the same, reported Times Now.

On 25 September, 2018, the Supreme Court had held that each candidate must declare his or her criminal antecedents to the Election Commission before contesting any polls. It had asked Parliament to ensure that criminals do not come into politics.

"There is no bar on criminal antecedents of political leaders. It's up to Parliament to make laws," a bench headed by then chief justice Dipak Misra had said after hearing the petition seeking to disqualify chargesheeted candidates from contesting polls.

In the unanimous verdict, the bench, also comprising justices RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, had said political parties are obligated to share all information about their candidates on their websites.

A chargesheet does not debar a person from contesting elections, and cases usually take years to be decided. As a tentative measure, on 1 November, 2017, the Supreme Court had directed the Centre to set up special fast-track courts to try the more than 1,581 cases pending against legislators.

Updated Date:

also read

Welfare state's first responsibility to provide food to people dying of hunger, SC tells Centre on community kitchen policy
India

Welfare state's first responsibility to provide food to people dying of hunger, SC tells Centre on community kitchen policy

The PIL, filed by social activists Anun Dhawan, Ishann Dhawan, and Kunjana Singh, had also sought a direction to the Centre for creating a national food grid for people falling outside the purview of the public distribution scheme

SC to hear plea seeking direction to CBSE for maintaining original results on 6 December
Education

SC to hear plea seeking direction to CBSE for maintaining original results on 6 December

The plea stated that the petitioners have been either declared failed or awarded very less marks in the improvement examinations

'Trial in 99% of POCSO cases was still pending by December 2020'
India

'Trial in 99% of POCSO cases was still pending by December 2020'

According to a study, 42 percent of the total rape cases were committed against children below 18 years in 2020, compared to 47 percent in 2018 and 45 percent in 2019