Shivaji memorial: SC issues notice to Centre, Maharashtra govt over refusal to restrain authorities from going ahead with project

The Supreme Court has sought responses from the Centre and Maharashtra government on a plea challenging the Bombay High Court order which had refused to restrain authorities from taking steps regarding the proposed Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Memorial project in Arabian Sea.

Press Trust of India January 16, 2019 19:01:34 IST
Shivaji memorial: SC issues notice to Centre, Maharashtra govt over refusal to restrain authorities from going ahead with project
  • A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justice SK Kaul issued notices on the plea which has challenged the 2 November, 2018, order of the Bombay high court

  • The petitioner had claimed that an amendment in a clause of the Coastal Zone Notification 2011 was

  • The state government had opposed the plea in the Bombay high court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has sought responses from the Centre and Maharashtra government on a plea challenging the Bombay High Court order which had refused to restrain authorities from taking steps regarding the proposed Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Memorial project in Arabian Sea.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justice SK Kaul issued notices on the plea which has challenged the 2 November, 2018, order of the high court.

Shivaji memorial SC issues notice to Centre Maharashtra govt over refusal to restrain authorities from going ahead with project

Representational image. Wikicommon

Advocate Nishant R Katneshwarkar, who appeared for Maharashtra, said that while issuing a notice on the plea, the bench orally told him to ask the authorities not to proceed with the construction activity there.

The petitioner NGO, Conservation Action Trust, had moved the high court challenging the 23 February, 2015 order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) granting environmental and coastal regulation zone clearance to the Rs 3,600 crore project in Mumbai.

It had sought interim relief that stay should be granted on the order and the authorities restrained from taking further steps with regard to the project.

The petitioner had claimed in the high court that an amendment in a clause of the Coastal Zone Notification 2011 by a 1 7 February, 2015, notification of the MoEF&CC was "illegal" as it permitted the Centre to dispense with the requirement of public hearing in such projects.

The state government had opposed the plea in the high court and had said that clearances were taken for the project from different authorities. It had argued that final environmental and CRZ clearance of 23 February, 2015, was granted by the MoEF&CC after a detailed study and after ascertaining the compliance of all requirements and after following proper procedure.

The high court, while rejecting the petitioner's request for interim relief, had noted in its order that the state has said that the memorial project does not involve rehabilitation and resettlement of public, and the site is located away from human habitation.

"It also cannot be overlooked that the project is considered by the state government to be of national importance," the high court had noted in its order.

Updated Date:

also read

Supreme Court says reprimanding students for indiscipline not tantamount to provocation for suicide
India

Supreme Court says reprimanding students for indiscipline not tantamount to provocation for suicide

The top court said it is a solemn duty of a teacher to instill discipline and reprimanding a student for not being attentive, up to the mark in studies, bunking classes or not attending the school is not uncommon

Supreme Court says regulation of medical education has become business, tragedy of nation
India

Supreme Court says regulation of medical education has become business, tragedy of nation

The top court was hearing a batch of pleas of 41 Post Graduate doctors and others who have challenged the last minute changes made to the NEET Super Speciality Examination 2021 syllabus

Delay in recording eyewitness statement can't result in rejection of their testimonies, says Supreme Court
India

Delay in recording eyewitness statement can't result in rejection of their testimonies, says Supreme Court

Dismissing an appeal challenging convictions in a murder case, the bench said the material on record establishes the fear created by the accused persons, and adequately explains the delay