Trending:

Shaheen Bagh protesters can't block public road indefinitely: SC issues notice to Centre, Delhi govt on pleas against anti-CAA demonstration

Press Trust of India February 10, 2020, 15:05:00 IST

At the fag end of the hearing on Shaheen Bagh protests, when advocate appearing for a petitioner insisted that some directions may be passed as people are facing inconvenience due to the blockade of public roads, the bench said, ‘If you have waited for over 50 days, wait for some more days.’

Advertisement
Shaheen Bagh protesters can't block public road indefinitely: SC issues notice to Centre, Delhi govt on pleas against anti-CAA demonstration

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday said the anti-CAA protesters at Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh cannot block public roads and create inconvenience for others. The apex court issued notices to the Centre, Delhi government and the police on pleas seeking removal of protesters from Shaheen Bagh. “There is a law and people have grievance against it. The matter is pending in court. Despite that some people are protesting. They are entitled to protest,” a bench comprising justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph said. [caption id=“attachment_7971211” align=“alignleft” width=“380”]File image of anti-CAA protesters at Shaheen Bagh in New Delhi. PTI File image of anti-CAA protesters at Shaheen Bagh in New Delhi. PTI[/caption] “You cannot block the public roads. There cannot be indefinite period of protest in such an area. If you want to protest, it has to be in an area identified for protest,” the bench said. The apex court further said that the protest at Shaheen Bagh has been going on for long but, it cannot create inconvenience for others. The bench said it would not pass any direction without hearing the other side and posted the matter for 17 February. At the outset, advocate Amit Sahni, one of the petitioners in the case, said that the question in this matter is about the extent of right to protest. “Is there anybody present from the government’s side. We will issue notice,” the bench said. When advocate Shashank Deo Sudhi, appearing for another petitioner and former BJP MLA Nand Kishore Garg, urged the bench to pass some direction, the court said, “It can’t be done ex-parte”. Advocate Mehmood Pracha told the court that he wanted to intervene in the matter on behalf of Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Azad. “Do whatever you feel proper,” the bench told Pracha. At the fag end of the hearing, when Sudhi insisted that some directions may be passed as people are facing inconvenience due to the blockade of public roads, the bench said, “If you have waited for over 50 days, wait for some more days.”

QUICK LINKS

Home Video Shorts Live TV