SC verdict on Sabarimala: Kerala govt to consult legal experts to get more clarity on decision, says Pinarayi Vijayan

Vijayan said the Supreme Court has not changed its stand with regard to the 28 September order of 2018 that allowed women of all age groups to offer prayers at the shrine.

Press Trust of India November 14, 2019 23:51:40 IST
SC verdict on Sabarimala: Kerala govt to consult legal experts to get more clarity on decision, says Pinarayi Vijayan
  • The Left government would consult legal experts to get more clarity on the Supreme Court's Sabarimala verdict, Pinarayi Vijayan said.

  • However, Vijayan said that it seems that the earlier order on allowing entry of women of all age groups still stands.

  • Vijayan said the state government was always ready to implement the court order, whatsoever it may be.

Thiruvananthapuram: The Left government would consult legal experts to get more clarity on the Supreme Court's Sabarimala verdict but it seems that the earlier order on allowing entry of women of all age groups still stands, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said on Thursday.

Vijayan, who met the media here to explain the government stand in the backdrop of the apex court's decision to refer the case to a larger bench, said the state government was always ready to implement the court order, whatsoever it may be.

The top court has decided to set up a larger bench to re-examine religious issues including those arising out of its earlier verdict that lifted a centuries-old ban on women of menstruating age visiting the shrine.

SC verdict on Sabarimala Kerala govt to consult legal experts to get more clarity on decision says Pinarayi Vijayan

Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. News18

Asked if women will be provided security to enter the shrine, Vijayan said such things can only be decided after clearing "certain doubts and confusions" in the order.

Ahead of the pilgrimage season commencing on 17 November, Vijayan said "It seems like the 28 SeptemberKera, 2018, order still stands. However, there are certain confusions with regard to today's order. The court ordered for a seven-judge bench to consider various gender related issues.It had kept pending the review petitions on Sabarimala. We need to get more clarity on various matters," he said.

The five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi Thursday said a larger bench will re-examine various religious issues, including the entry of women into the Sabarimala temple and mosques and the practice of female genital mutilation in the Dawoodi Bohra community.

A 3:2 verdict decided to keep pending the pleas seeking a review of its decision regarding the entry of women into the shrine, and said restrictions on women in religious places was not restricted to Sabarimala alone and was prevalent in other religions as well.

Vijayan said the Supreme Court has not changed its stand with regard to the 28 September order of 2018 that allowed women of all age groups to offer prayers at the shrine.

"We will study all legal aspects of the order..we will consult legal experts and decide the future course," he said when asked about the entry of women of all age groups in to the shrine since there was no stay.

Meanwhile, the State police department has warned that stringent action would be taken against those spreading false messages on social media and incite violence in the backdrop of the Sabarimala verdict.

Those who spread messages, through social media, affecting the communal harmony of the state will be arrested immediately and charged under non-bailable sections, a police press release said.

All sorts of accounts across various social media platforms are being closely monitored by the Cyber Cell, Cyberdom and Cyber Police Stations, the release added.

Updated Date:

also read

Supreme Court judge recuses self from hearing journalist Tarun Tejpal's plea in sexual assault case
India

Supreme Court judge recuses self from hearing journalist Tarun Tejpal's plea in sexual assault case

The acquittal of Tejpal, former editor-in-chief of Tehelka magazine by a sessions court in May 2021 was challenged in the Goa bench of the high court by the state government

Supreme Court pulls up states for failing to disburse claims to COVID-19 victims' next of kin
India

Supreme Court pulls up states for failing to disburse claims to COVID-19 victims' next of kin

The apex court asked the chief secretaries of Andhra Pradesh and Bihar to explain why disbursals - Rs 50,000 ex gratia for COVID-19 death - have been so few in their states

No person can be forced to get vaccinated against their wishes: Centre tells SC
India

No person can be forced to get vaccinated against their wishes: Centre tells SC

The ministry said that "it's duly advised, advertised and communicated through print and social media platforms that all citizens should get vaccinated. However, no person can be forced to be vaccinated against their wishes".