SC to review its own order restricting automatic arrests in dowry cases, says judgment went against women’s rights

The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will review its July order diluting the anti-dowry law and added that it won't allow the legislation to become meaningless

FP Staff October 13, 2017 14:55:50 IST
SC to review its own order restricting automatic arrests in dowry cases, says judgment went against women’s rights

The Supreme Court on Friday said it will review its July order diluting the anti-dowry law and added that it won't allow the legislation to become meaningless, said media reports.

In response to a PIL, the apex court, according to Hindustan Timessaid that it will revisit its own ruling restricting automatic arrests in dowry cases, adding that the judgment went against women’s rights.

“We do not agree with the judgment which laid down the guidelines,” Hindustan Times quoted the chief justice-led three-judge bench as saying.

In July, the Supreme Court, to curb the misuse of anti-dowry laws, had directed that no arrest should be made in dowry harassment cases without verification of complaint by a committee of civil society members.

The apex court, which passed a slew of directions to deal with complaints under Section 498 A (subjecting a married woman to cruelty) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) including constitution of family welfare committees in every district, had observed that many complaints filed under the anti-dowry law were not bonafide and had said that "uncalled for arrest" may ruin the chances of a settlement.

The court while expressing concern over the misuse of the anti-dowry law by disgruntled wives had said that it was a high time such frivolous cases which violated the human rights of the innocent were checked, The Times of India had reported.

"We are conscious of the object for which the provision was brought into the statute. At the same time, violation of human rights of (the) innocent cannot be brushed aside," a bench of justices AK Goel and UU Lalit was quoted as saying by The Times of India.

Anshul Verma, a BJP member in the Lok Sabha in July had demanded amendment in the dowry law, dubbing it as "legal terrorism" and claiming that it had become a tool for harassment of men.

Raising the issue during the Zero Hour, Verma had said that over 27 lakh persons were arrested between 1998-2015 in such cases and these included minors.

He had sought amendments to Section 498A of the IPC under which a man and his family could be summarily arrested when a complaint of cruelty was lodged by the wife.

With inputs from agencies.

Updated Date:

also read

Copa America 2021: Brazil Supreme Court gives green light to tournament despite COVID-19 pandemic
Sports

Copa America 2021: Brazil Supreme Court gives green light to tournament despite COVID-19 pandemic

Various judges however ordered the government to take additional safety measures.

Explained: SC striking down Maratha reservation will keep the pot stirring over quota agitation
India

Explained: SC striking down Maratha reservation will keep the pot stirring over quota agitation

Calls for a fresh push for the demand have followed the Supreme Court's 5 May decision that held that total reservations cannot breach the 50 percent ceiling.

Maharashtra govt making 'all possible effort' to give reservation to Maratha community, says Ajit Pawar
India

Maharashtra govt making 'all possible effort' to give reservation to Maratha community, says Ajit Pawar

Last month, the Supreme Court had struck down the state govt's law granting quota to Marathas in college admissions and public jobs, terming it 'unconstitutional'