SC to hear petitions today challenging Karnataka HC order quashing govt regulation on pictorial warning on tobacco products

The Supreme Court agreed to hear on Friday itself a batch of petitions on pictorial warning on tobacco products

PTI December 22, 2017 12:38:23 IST
SC to hear petitions today challenging Karnataka HC order quashing govt regulation on pictorial warning on tobacco products

New Delhi: The Supreme Court agreed to hear on Friday itself a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court order which quashed the government regulation that packets of tobacco products must carry pictorial warning covering 85 percent of packaging space.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul considered the submission for urgent hearing on the appeals filed against the high court verdict and said it would hear the plea at 3.30 pm.

Several petitions including the one filed by NGO Health for Millions Trust have challenged the high court verdict.

The high court had on 15 December struck down the 2014 amendment rules that mandated pictorial health warnings to cover 85 percent of tobacco product packaging space, holding that they violated Constitutional norms.

SC to hear petitions today challenging Karnataka HC order quashing govt regulation on pictorial warning on tobacco products

Representational image. AP

The high court had, however, made it clear that the 40 percent pictorial health warning rule, which existed prior to the amendment rules, would remain in force.

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Amendment Rules, 2014 (COTPA) came into effect from 1 April last year.

In May last year, the Supreme Court had transferred all petitions against the 85 percent rule filed in various high courts to the Karnataka High Court and asked it to hear and dispose of them.

Passing its orders, the high court had held that the Union Health Ministry does not have any jurisdictional power to make such rules.

From the perspective of tobacco growers, such a rule violated the Right To Equality under Article 14 of the Constitution because there was no connection between the images and the warnings, the high court had observed.

The petitioners, the Tobacco Institute of India and others, had challenged enforcement of the COTPA which required printing of pictorial health warnings covering 85 percent of tobacco product packages.

The petitioners argued the rules were impractical and would boost smuggling of imported cigarettes.

The tobacco industry had said there was no evidence to show smoking causes the diseases depicted in the "extremely gruesome and unreasonable" pictures.

The bench observed that the rules cannot be made to scare people but to issue notifications.

The industry also said the global average size for graphic health warnings (GHWs) was only about 30 percent of the principal display area.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

In rejecting SC proposal to negotiate with panel, protesting farmers are displaying obduracy
India

In rejecting SC proposal to negotiate with panel, protesting farmers are displaying obduracy

The protesting farmer unions have accused the Union government of stubbornness and advised the Centre to shed its ego but they would do well to heed their own advice.

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of pollution in Yamuna river, issues notice to Haryana
India

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of pollution in Yamuna river, issues notice to Haryana

The court was hearing a plea by Delhi Jal Board alleging that the water released by Haryana in Yamuna river has pollutants including high ammonia content which become carcinogenic after mixing with chlorine

Allahabad High Court makes publication of notice for interfaith marriage optional
India

Allahabad High Court makes publication of notice for interfaith marriage optional

Making such publication mandatory would invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court ruled