SC seeks Chhattisgarh's response on DU professor Nandini Sundar's plea to drop her name from murder case FIR
Lawyer appearing for Sundar and petitioners, said that they wanted the removal of their names as every time she and others travelled abroad, they have to mention if there is a case pending against them.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought the Chhattisgarh government's response on a plea by Delhi University Professor Nandini Sundar seeking the removal of her name and those of five others from a FIR in an alleged murder case.
A bench of Justices Madan B. Lokur, S. Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta also directed the state government to explain what it had done for the past two years when the FIR was registered in 2016, and what it intended to do now.
The apex court has given the Chhattisgarh government three weeks to file its reply.
"You can't let an FIR hanging on somebody," Justice Lokur said.
While issuing notice to the state government, Justice Lokur said that the names could be removed from the FIR (First Information Report) only after quashing it.
Senior counsel Ashok Desai, appearing for Sundar, said that they wanted the removal of their names as every time she and others travelled abroad, they have to mention if there is a case pending against them.
On 15 November 2016, the top court had directed the Chhattisgarh government to give Sundar a four-week notice if it wanted to act in the case.
At that time the Chhattisgarh government had told the top court that it will neither arrest nor interrogate Sundar.
The court was also told that the other accused named in the FIR too would neither be arrested nor interrogated.
The court had on 15 November 2016 said that Sunder can approach the court as and when she is given a notice that the Chhattisgarh government intended to proceed against her in pursuance of the FIR.
Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro at ₹499 for the first year. Use code PRO499. Limited period offer. *T&C apply
The nation's highest court delivered a blow to the ex-president, who has been waging a protracted legal battle to prevent his tax records from being handed over to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance
The apex court said the proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will go on and but will not culminate into any final order on an amalgamation of FRL with Reliance
State home minister Tamradhwaj Sahu, in a written reply, also said that 315 Naxals surrendered in 2019 while 344 surrendered in 2020