SC refuses to quash FIRs against TV anchor Amish Devgan for 'derogatory' remark against Sufi saint

Devgan had allegedly used a derogatory term for Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti in a debate show on 15 June. He later apologised saying he inadvertently named Chisti instead of Muslim ruler Alauddin Khilji.

Press Trust of India December 07, 2020 17:40:17 IST
SC refuses to quash FIRs against TV anchor Amish Devgan for 'derogatory' remark against Sufi saint

File image of the Supreme Court of India. PTI

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to quash FIRs against TV anchor Amish Devgan for his alleged defamatory remark against Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti during a show on 15 June but said he will get protection from any coercive action if he continues to cooperate with the probe.

A bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna also transferred all FIRs filed against Devgan in different states, including Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Telangana, to Ajmer in Rajasthan.

The apex court had earlier granted Devgan protection from any coercive action in connection with the FIRs.

Several FIRs were lodged against Devgan for using a derogatory term for the Sufi saint in the news debate show called ''Aar Paar'' on his channel on 15 June. Devgan later tweeted an apology saying he was actually referring to Muslim ruler Alauddin Khilji and inadvertently ended up naming Chisti.

Devgan through his lawyer Mrinal Bharti had moved the top court seeking quashing of the FIRs saying it was a slip of the tongue and he had already expressed regret for the 'inadvertent" error.  He had told the apex court that "none of the FIRs said that public order was being disturbed".

Senior advocate Manish Singhvi, appearing for Rajasthan, had opposed Devgan's plea for quashing of the FIRs saying the investigation is the right of the police.

The apex court, while granting interim relief to Devgan, had also stayed the probe in the cases related to the telecast against the journalist. The journalist has said the plea concerned his life and liberty.

"In a well-orchestrated manner, the petitioner has been made a victim of country-wide filing of false and baseless criminal complaint and FIRs on the one hand, and on the other hand, petitioner, his family and his crew has been abused unabashedly on social media and by personal messages by unknown persons. The petitioner has also received several death threats from various anti-social elements," Devgan's plea submitted.

It said that Devgan was holding a discussion on a petition filed before the top court on his show on 15 June on the issue of the Places of Worship Special Provisions Act.

"During the course of the live heated discussion one of the panelists quoted 'Chisti' (Hazrat Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti) and inadvertently, the petitioner (Devgan) who wanted to refer to the historical figure Khilji(Alauddin Khilji) as a marauder, mentioned the name 'Chisti'," the plea submitted.

"That immediately on realising his inadvertent slip of tongue during the heated debate in his show, the petitioner tendered a clarification and clarified that the name "Chisti' was mentioned by error and inadvertently," it said.

Devgan tweeted the clarification on his personal Twitter account on the intervening night of 16-17 June. The channel also carried a video clarification featuring the journalist, the plea said.

The Sufi saint's dargah in Ajmer is an important pilgrimage centre and visited by thousands of people each day.

Updated Date:

also read

PM Modi to participate in Constitution Day celebrations at Supreme Court on Saturday
India

PM Modi to participate in Constitution Day celebrations at Supreme Court on Saturday

Prime Minister Modi will launch various new initiatives under the e-court project, as part of the programme. The e-court project is an attempt by the government to provide services to litigants, lawyers and the judiciary through ICT enablement of courts

Supreme Court directs Centre to produce file related to appointment of Election Commissioner Arun Goel
India

Supreme Court directs Centre to produce file related to appointment of Election Commissioner Arun Goel

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice K M Joseph said it wants to know whether there was any “hanky panky” in Goel's appointment as election commissioner as he was only recently given voluntary retirement from service

What is the collegium system and why Centre and Supreme Court are at loggerheads over it?
India

What is the collegium system and why Centre and Supreme Court are at loggerheads over it?

The collegium system is a way to appoint judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. Recently, the Supreme Court also pressed the Centre to clear recommendations made by the collegium. The central government has sent back 19 names recommended by the group for appointment as HC judges