SC dismisses petition seeking President's Rule in Uttar Pradesh over rising crime in state

The petitioner, advocate CR Jaya Sukin, cited NCRB and NHRC data in his plea. However, the Bench dismissed his claims and said a 'heavy fine will be imposed if he continues his arguments'

Press Trust of India February 08, 2021 20:33:21 IST
SC dismisses petition seeking President's Rule in Uttar Pradesh over rising crime in state

File image of the Supreme Court of India. PTI

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Monday dismissed a petition seeking imposition of President's rule in Uttar Pradesh citing alleged breakdown of Constitutional machinery and rising crime in the state.

The top court warned the petitioner-advocate of imposing cost on him and questioned him about the research of crime records of other states.

A bench of Chief Justice Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian told petitioner- advocate CR Jaya Sukin that there is no research on the claims which he has been making and asked him how his fundamental rights were violated.

Sukin while referring to data of National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) said that he has done his research and crime graph has gone up in Uttar Pradesh.

"In how many states have you studied the crime record? Have you studied crime records of other states? What is your research of crime records in other states? Show us on what basis you are saying this," the bench said.

The top court said that there is no research done by him on the claims he has been making. The bench, while dismissing the plea said, "We will impose heavy cost on you if you will argue further".

Sukin, who appeared in person in the hearing conducted through video conferencing, alleged that unlawful and arbitrary killings including extrajudicial killings are being perpetrated by police in Uttar Pradesh.

He alleged that situation has arisen in the state in which the government of Uttar Pradesh cannot be allowed to carry on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.

That imposition of Article 356 of the Constitution in Uttar Pradesh is necessary to save the Indian democracy and lives of 20 Crore people, he claimed in his petition.

Updated Date:

Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro at ₹499 for the first year. Use code PRO499. Limited period offer. *T&C apply

also read

SC to not share video conference links for hearings on WhatsApp group
India

SC to not share video conference links for hearings on WhatsApp group

The decision came days after Centre issued regulations for social media firms, making it mandatory for them to identify originators of messages that threaten India’s security and sovereignty

Heirs of woman's father entitled to inherit her property under Hindu Succession Act, says Supreme Court
India

Heirs of woman's father entitled to inherit her property under Hindu Succession Act, says Supreme Court

The top court gave the ruling after a widowed woman's decision to transfer her share of her husband's property in favour of her brother's son was challenged in court

Palghar lynching case: SC asks Maharashtra Police to place fresh chargesheet on record
India

Palghar lynching case: SC asks Maharashtra Police to place fresh chargesheet on record

A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan and R S Reddy was informed by the counsel for the Maharashtra govt that a second supplementary chargesheet has been filed in the case