SC asks Subramanian Swamy to mention plea regarding Ayodhya temple, after verdict on mosques' role in Islam

On 20 July, the special bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra reserved its order on a plea by Muslim groups of the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute seeking reconsideration by a larger bench on the observations made by it in a 1994 verdict that a mosque was not integral to Islam.

Press Trust of India July 25, 2018 13:38:31 IST
SC asks Subramanian Swamy to mention plea regarding Ayodhya temple, after verdict on mosques' role in Islam

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked BJP leader Subramanian Swamy to mention his plea, seeking enforcement of his fundamental right to pray at the disputed site in Ayodhya, after it pronounces its verdict on the question of whether mosques are integral to Islam.

SC asks Subramanian Swamy to mention plea regarding Ayodhya temple after verdict on mosques role in Islam

File photo of senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy. PTI

On 20 July, the special bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra reserved its order on a plea by Muslim groups of the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute seeking reconsideration by a larger bench on the observations made by it in a 1994 verdict that a mosque was not integral to Islam.

M Siddiq, one of the original litigants of the Ayodhya case who has died and is being represented through his legal heir, had assailed certain findings of the 1994 verdict in the case of M Ismail Faruqui holding that a mosque was not integral to the prayers offered by the followers of Islam. The bench, which also comprised Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, asked Swamy to seek listing and urgent hearing of his plea on right to pray after the pronouncement of verdict in the main matter.

Swamy had moved the apex court seeking enforcement of his right earlier as well. Swamy, at whose instance the sensitive land dispute case in Ayodhya was fast-tracked, had filed a separate petition stating that he had a fundamental right to offer hassle-free prayer at the birthplace of Lord Ram.

The special bench of the apex court has a total of 14 appeals filed against the high court judgment delivered in four civil suits. A three-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court, in a 2:1 majority ruling, had in 2010 ordered that the land is partitioned equally among three parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Hathras gangrape accused claim innocence in letter to SP; victim's kin move Allahabad HC against 'illegal confinement'
India

Hathras gangrape accused claim innocence in letter to SP; victim's kin move Allahabad HC against 'illegal confinement'

The gangrape victim's family have termed the letter to the Hathras SP as "lies" and said that none of them knew any of the four accused

Hathras rape case: Victim's family to record statement before Allahabad HC today, hearing to begin at 2.15 pm
India

Hathras rape case: Victim's family to record statement before Allahabad HC today, hearing to begin at 2.15 pm

Case is listed before a division bench of Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice Rajan Roy. The court had ordered Hathras authorities to arrange for family's travel

Allahabad High Court grants bail to journalist Prashant Kanojia two months after arrest
India

Allahabad High Court grants bail to journalist Prashant Kanojia two months after arrest

Kanojia was arrested on 18 August for allegedly sharing an objectionable post on Twitter related to Ram Temple and saying that he did it on the directive of Hindu Sena chief Sushil Tiwari, who denied the allegation