Sabarimala row: Supreme Court agrees to hear plea of two women seeking 24x7 security after they entered temple

The petition in the Supreme Court seeks 24x7 security for the two women who entered the Sabarimala temple in Kerala and also to deal with protesters indulging in acts of violence, physical and/or verbal on social media or otherwise against them in accordance with the law.

Press Trust of India January 17, 2019 13:48:48 IST
Sabarimala row: Supreme Court agrees to hear plea of two women seeking 24x7 security after they entered temple
  • Senior advocate Indira Jaising listed the matter before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and justices LN Rao and SK Kaul.

  • In the plea, one of the women, who was attacked by her mother-in-law, has sought security for both the women.

  • The plea sought directions to all authorities to allow women of all age groups to enter the temple without any hindrance and to ensure their safe passage.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court said on Thursday it will hear on Friday a plea seeking 24x7 security for the two women who recently entered the Sabarimala temple in Kerala.

Senior advocate Indira Jaising listed the matter before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and justices LN Rao and SK Kaul.

In the plea, one of the women, who was attacked by her mother-in-law, has sought security for both the women.

Sabarimala row Supreme Court agrees to hear plea of two women seeking 24x7 security after they entered temple

Kanaka Durga (left) and Bindu Ammini. Reuters

The plea sought directions to all authorities to allow women of all age groups to enter the temple without any hindrance and to ensure security and safe passage, including police security to women wishing to enter the temple in future. It also pointed to danger to her life and liberty.

"Issue writ of mandamus directing authorities to provide full security, 24x7, to the two women who have entered the temple, and to deal with protesters indulging in acts of violence, physical and/or verbal on social media or otherwise against them in accordance with the law," the petition said.

It sought directions declaring all authorities not to conduct the rite of purification or to shut the temple on account of any woman of the age of 10-50 having entered the temple.

"Issue directions to declare that the rite of purification diminishes the dignity as human beings and violates their fundamental right," it said.

It also sought directions declaring that any form of prevention of women aged between 10 to 50 years from visiting the hilltop shrine is contrary to the 28 September, 2018, judgment of the apex court.

On 28 September last year, a five-judge Constitution bench, headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, in a 4:1 verdict paved the way for entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala temple, saying the ban amounted to gender discrimination.

Two women of menstruating age group had stepped into the Sabarimala temple of Lord Ayyappa, breaking a centuries-old tradition and defying dire threats from the Hindu right.
Kanakadurga, 44, and Bindu, 42, stepped into the hallowed precincts guarded by police three months after the apex court's historic judgment lifting the ban on entry of girls and women between 10 and 50 years of age into the shrine of Lord Ayyappa, its "eternally celibate" deity.

Following the entry of the women into the shrine, the chief priest had decided to close the sanctum sanctorum of the temple to perform the 'purification' ceremony.

The top court has said it may not start hearing pleas seeking a review of the Sabarimala verdict from January 22 as one of the judges was on medical leave.

Earlier, the apex court decided to hear in open court the review petitions against the verdict. Besides Justice Indu Malhotra and the CJI, justices RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud are part of the five-judge constitution bench.

Justice Malhotra had delivered the dissenting judgment in the case.

There are around 48 petitions seeking review of the judgment and they were filed following violent protests in favour and against the verdict.

Despite the Supreme Court's historic ruling, permitting women in the 10-50 age group, no children or young women in the 'barred' group were able to offer prayers at the shrine following frenzied protests by devotees and right-wing outfits.

 

Updated Date:

also read

Supreme Court says regulation of medical education has become business, tragedy of nation
India

Supreme Court says regulation of medical education has become business, tragedy of nation

The top court was hearing a batch of pleas of 41 Post Graduate doctors and others who have challenged the last minute changes made to the NEET Super Speciality Examination 2021 syllabus

Changes in NEET super specialty exam pattern to be implemented from next year, Centre tells SC
India

Changes in NEET super specialty exam pattern to be implemented from next year, Centre tells SC

The bench, however, said that it is leaving the question open on the validity of the changes made in the pattern of the examination.

SC dismisses Supertech's plea seeking modification of order to raze twin 40-storey towers
India

SC dismisses Supertech's plea seeking modification of order to raze twin 40-storey towers

The apex court said that grant of such a relief is in the nature of a review of the judgement of this court and in various decisions.