Sabarimala protests: Kerala court grants bail to activist Rahul Easwar on last day of pilgrimage
Rahul Easwar was charged by the Pamba Police in Kerala for unlawful assembly and rioting during protests blocking women from entering Sabarimala temple.
Activist Rahul Easwar, who was arrested on 17 October for protesting against the Supreme Court verdict allowing the entry of women between 10 to 50 years into the Sabarimala temple, was granted bail by a local court on Monday.
He was charged by the Pamba Police in Kerala under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Section 143 (unlawful assembly) and 147 (rioting). The non-bailable charge against him was under Section 353 for stopping police personnel from doing their duty.
Easwar's bail plea was rejected on Sunday, as the court asked the police to file a report on the ongoing protests by Monday for it to consider any new bail applications. He had been participating in protests to stop women from entering the Sabarimala temple in Kerala the day the shrine opened for Lord Ayyappa pilgrims.
After being taken into custody, Easwar had launched an indefinite hunger strike. CNN-News18 reported that he was subsequently admitted to the Government Medical College in Thiruvananthapuram. Once the bail order is out, he is likely to be shifted to another hospital.
— News18 (@CNNnews18) October 22, 2018
Hundreds of devotees are camping at the Sabarimala Sannidhanam temple complex to prevent women of menstruating age from reaching the shrine, located in a dense forest.
Angry protesters have turned back nearly a dozen women attempting to visit the shrine of Lord Ayyappa, the presiding deity of Sabarimala temple considered "naishtika brahmachari" (eternally celibate), since its doors opened for five-day prayers on 17 October. The temple closed on Monday and will reopen on 17 November.
The Travancore Devaswom Board, which is the custodian of the temple, will submit a detailed report about the events that unfolded in Pampa and Nilakkal over the last five days to the Supreme Court and the Kerala High Court.
The Supreme Court is expected to decide on Tuesday about when the review petitions, challenging its 8 October verdict, pending before it will be listed for hearing.
With inputs from agencies
Supreme Court bench expresses displeasure over new case listing system introduced by Chief Justice UU Lalit
The new listing system is not giving adequate time to take up matters fixed for hearing like the present case as there are number of matters within the span of an afternoon session, said a bench headed by Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Sourav Ganguly all set to continue as BCCI president for another term after SC accepts amendment to board's constitution
Supreme court do away with the three-year cooling-off period; allowing Sourav Ganguly and Jay Shah a shot at six-year tenure (two terms of three years each) at a stretch as BCCI president and secretary respectively
The apex court is hearing arguments on a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court verdict refusing to lift the ban on hijab in educational institutions of the state that have prescribed uniforms