Robert Vadra moves application in Delhi court seeking copy of documents seized by ED in December raid

Robert Vadra said in his application that the ED has been interrogating him based on the seized documents and therefore their copies should be provided to him. On 7 December, 2018, the agency had carried out raids at Vadra's offices at Delhi.

Press Trust of India February 23, 2019 19:01:36 IST
Robert Vadra moves application in Delhi court seeking copy of documents seized by ED in December raid
  • Robert Vadra moved an application in a Delhi court, seeking a copy of documents seized by the agency in a raid conducted at his offices last year

  • Special Judge Arvind Kumar posted the matter for 25 February

  • Vadra has appeared before the ED for questioning on multiple occasions in Delhi and Jaipur

New Delhi: Robert Vadra, facing an Enforcement Directorate (ED) probe in cases of alleged money laundering, moved an application in a Delhi court on Saturday, seeking a copy of documents seized by the agency in a raid conducted at his offices last year. Special Judge Arvind Kumar posted the matter for 25 February.

The application which was moved through senior advocate KTS Tulsi sought a copy of the documents seized by the agency from Vadra's office.

Robert Vadra moves application in Delhi court seeking copy of documents seized by ED in December raid

File image of Robert Vadra. PTI

Vadra, who is the brother-in-law of Congress president Rahul Gandhi, said in his application that the ED has been interrogating him based on the seized documents and therefore their copies should be provided to him. On 7 December, 2018, the agency had carried out raids at Vadra's offices at Delhi.

Vadra has appeared before the ED for questioning on multiple occasions in Delhi and Jaipur.

The money laundering cases being probed by the ED relate to purchase of alleged illegal assets abroad and an alleged land scam in Bikaner, Rajasthan. The court had on 16 February extended the interim bail granted to Vadra till 2 March.

Vadra had filed an anticipatory bail application in the case linked to allegations of money laundering in the purchase of a London-based property at 12, Bryanston Square worth £1.9 million. The property is allegedly owned by him.

The agency had earlier said it has received information about various new properties in London which allegedly belong to Vadra, including two houses of five and four million pounds each, six other flats and more properties.

The plea had said Vadra's office was raided by the ED on 7 December, 2018 and, therefore, he seriously apprehends that his liberty may be curtailed by the investigating agency. "The petitioner (Vadra) is being subjected to a farce criminal prosecution which actually is beset with nothing else except political vendetta and most unfortunately, the respondent (ED) being the law enforcement agency is a party to the unethical and illegal exercise.

"It is stated that the petitioner's (Vadra's) firm through its authorised representative Manoj Arora has already joined investigation with the ED conducting investigation into the affairs of the firm in Rajasthan with their offices at Jaipur on many occasions and has supplied all the relevant documents to the satisfaction of the officials of the ED," the plea had said.

Arora, an employee of Vadra's Skylight Hospitality LLP, was a key person in the case and he was aware of the latter's overseas undeclared assets and was instrumental in arranging funds, the ED had alleged.

Vadra had alleged that he is being "hounded and harassed" to subserve political ends. Arora had alleged before the court that the case was foisted on him by the NDA government out of "political vendetta". However, the ED had refuted the allegations, asking that "should no authority investigate any political bigwig because that will be called a political vendetta?"

The agency had told the court that it lodged the money laundering case against Arora after his role came to light during the probe of another case by the Income Tax Department under the newly enacted Black Money Act and tax law against absconding arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari.

It had alleged that the London-based property was bought by Bhandari for £1.9 million and sold in 2010 for the same amount despite incurring additional expenses of approximately £65,900 on its renovation. "This gives credence to the fact that Bhandari was not the actual owner of the property but it was beneficially owned by Vadra who was incurring expenditure on the renovation of this property," the ED had told the court.

Updated Date:

also read

Uddhav Thackeray back to the saffron fold? His defence of Savarkar against Rahul Gandhi’s remarks says so
Politics

Uddhav Thackeray back to the saffron fold? His defence of Savarkar against Rahul Gandhi’s remarks says so

The Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena faction has an alliance with the Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party, as part of the Maha Vikas Aghadi

Explained: Why Jacqueline Fernandez was granted bail in 200-crore money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar
Entertainment

Explained: Why Jacqueline Fernandez was granted bail in 200-crore money laundering case involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar

The bail was granted by Special Judge Shailendra Malik of Patiala House Court. The actress sought bail on the ground that the investigation was complete, and the charge sheet was filed.

SC seeks response from Centre & Delhi govt on conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s jail transfer plea
India

SC seeks response from Centre & Delhi govt on conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar’s jail transfer plea

After reviewing the details of three assaults on Sukesh within the jail, a bench presided over by Justice Ajay Rastogi issued a notice to the Mandoli Jail administration and sought a response within a week