Right to Privacy verdict: Justice DY Chandrachud overrules father's judgement on right to liberty during Emergency

Justice DY Chandrachud of the SC created history of sorts when he overruled a judgement of his father, who had held in 1975 that right to liberty is suspended during Emergency.

IANS August 24, 2017 19:55:28 IST
Right to Privacy verdict: Justice DY Chandrachud overrules father's judgement on right to liberty during Emergency

New Delhi: Justice DY Chandrachud of the Supreme Court on Thursday created history of sorts when he overruled a judgement of his father, Justice YV Chandrachud, who had held in 1975 that right to liberty is suspended during Emergency.

Right to Privacy verdict Justice DY Chandrachud overrules fathers judgement on right to liberty during Emergency

Representational image. AFP

Justice DY Chandrachud, writing the judgement for four judges including Chief Justice JS Khehar in the right to privacy case, observed that the judgments rendered by all the judges (including his father) constituting the majority in the ADM Jabalpur versus Shivkant Shukla "are seriously flawed".

"Life and personal liberty are inalienable to human existence. These rights are, as recognised in Kesavananda Bharati, primordial rights. They constitute rights under natural law. The human element in the life of the individual is integrally founded on the sanctity of life. Dignity is associated with liberty and freedom," he said.

"No civilised state can contemplate an encroachment upon life and personal liberty without the authority of law. Neither life nor liberty are bounties conferred by the state nor does the Constitution create these rights. The right to life existed even before the advent of the Constitution," Justice DY Chandrachud said on Thursday.

In the judgement in the ADM Jabalpur case, Justice Chandrachud (Senior) had written that the right to personal liberty has no hallmark and therefore when the right is put in action, it is impossible to identify whether the right is one given by the Constitution or prior to its enactment.

Whatever the source of the right and its jurisdiction, the right in essence and substance is the right to personal liberty which could be suspended during Emergency.

Updated Date:

also read

Narada sting tape case: SC judge Justice Aniruddha Bose recuses himself; how it will affect the case
India

Narada sting tape case: SC judge Justice Aniruddha Bose recuses himself; how it will affect the case

Narada sting tape case: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and minister Moloy Ghatak had filed petitions with the SC about their role on the day of the arrest of four TMC leaders by the CBI

Narada case: SC judge recuses himself from hearing appeals of Mamata Banerjee, Bengal minister Moloy Ghatak
India

Narada case: SC judge recuses himself from hearing appeals of Mamata Banerjee, Bengal minister Moloy Ghatak

Justice Aniruddha Bose said the issue will now be placed before CJI NV Ramana. Banerjee and Ghatak will submit information about their role in CBI's arrest of four TMC leaders

Can't pay Rs 4 lakh ex-gratia to COVID-19 victims due to financial constraints, Centre tells SC
India

Can't pay Rs 4 lakh ex-gratia to COVID-19 victims due to financial constraints, Centre tells SC

On 11 June, the Centre had told the top court that issues raised in pleas, seeking directions for ex-gratia compensation to families of COVID-19, are genuine and are under consideration