Receiving threats on Facebook: Lawyer representing Muslim parties in Babri Masjid land dispute case tells SC

'I am receiving threats on Facebook for appearing against in the case', he said

Asian News International September 12, 2019 16:19:04 IST
Receiving threats on Facebook: Lawyer representing Muslim parties in Babri Masjid land dispute case tells SC
  • Advocate Rajeev Dhavan submitted before SC, has been receiving threats on social media for representing Muslim parties in Babri Masjid land dispute case

  • 'I am receiving threats on Facebook for appearing against in the case', he said

  • He submitted before a five-judge constitution bench, headed by chief justice of India Ranjan Gogoi

New Delhi: Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing Muslim parties in the Ayodhya Babri Masjid land dispute case, on Thursday submitted before the Supreme Court (SC) that he has been receiving threats on social media for appearing in the matter.

Receiving threats on Facebook Lawyer representing Muslim parties in Babri Masjid land dispute case tells SC

File image of the Supreme Court of India. Reuters

"I am receiving threats on Facebook for appearing against in the case," he submitted before a five-judge constitution bench, headed by chief justice of India Ranjan Gogoi. However, Dhawan has said that he does not need any security at this point. Dhavan said that people tell him "Don't fight (argue) against the deity in the Supreme Court".

"I don't need any security at this point and I also don't want to file contempt petition one after the other either," Dr Dhavan told the court. The lawyer also submitted that an Uttar Pradesh minister had said that the judiciary, administration and the nation belonged to the BJP.

"Ram temple will be constructed as the matter is in Supreme Court and the SC is ours. The judiciary, administration, the nation as well as the Ram Temple belong to us," minister Mukut Bihari Verma had said.

Dhavan had already filed a contempt petition against an 88-year-old professor in Chennai, for cursing him and threatening him not appear before the apex court and to argue for the Muslim side in the case.

Dhavan had filed the contempt petitition against professor from Chennai, N Shanmugam for allegedly threatening him and asked him not to appear for the Muslim parties in the sensitive Ayodhya Babri masjid land dispute case.

On 8 August, a five-judge bench headed by CJI and including Justices DY Chandrachud, SA Bobde, Ashok Bhushan and SA Abdul Nazeer, had said that it will hear the Ayodhya title dispute case five days in the week, from Monday to Friday. The court is hearing appeals against the 30 September, 2010 verdict of the Allahabad High Court in the case.

Updated Date:

also read

Uttar Pradesh: Allahabad HC grants bail to SP's Azam Khan in land grabbing case
India

Uttar Pradesh: Allahabad HC grants bail to SP's Azam Khan in land grabbing case

The case in which Khan's bail plea has been approved is about wrongful possession of Waqf Board property. Notably, he had earlier been granted bail in 86 other cases

Politicians shouldn't make irresponsible remarks, says HC; denies bail to four Lakhimpur accused
India

Politicians shouldn't make irresponsible remarks, says HC; denies bail to four Lakhimpur accused

The court will hear on 25 May the bail plea of Union minister Ajay Mishra's son Ashish Mishra, whose bail was earlier cancelled by the Supreme Court

Open closed doors in Taj Mahal to ascertain presence of Hindu idols: Plea in HC
India

Open closed doors in Taj Mahal to ascertain presence of Hindu idols: Plea in HC

Citing an RTI filed to the ASI regarding the reason for the doors being locked in Taj Mahal, the plea stated in the reply the ASI had said they were locked due to security reasons