Rafale verdict: Supreme Court dismisses petitions to review December 2018 verdict, warns Rahul Gandhi not to 'drag court into political discourse'

A three-member Bench of the Supreme Court dismissed all petitions seeking review of the apex court’s 2018 order in the Rafale fighter jets deal case, holding that the pleas were without merit

FP Staff November 14, 2019 12:24:29 IST
Rafale verdict: Supreme Court dismisses petitions to review December 2018 verdict, warns Rahul Gandhi not to 'drag court into political discourse'
  • A three-member Bench of the Supreme Court dismissed all petitions seeking review of the apex court's 2018 order in the Rafale fighter jets deal case

  • A contempt petition filed by BJP's Meenakshi Lekhi against Congress' Rahul Gandhi for wrongly attributing his 'chowkidar chor hai' slogan to the court was also dismissed

  • The Bench, comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph, rejected the contention that there was a need for registration of FIRs

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court dismissed all petitions seeking review of the apex court’s 2018 order in the Rafale fighter jets deal case, holding that the pleas were without merit.

In the 14 December, 2018 order, the Supreme Court had said that there was no reason to doubt the decision-making process in the procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets and gave a clean chit to the Narendra Modi-led government at the Centre. The court had also dismissed the plea for a court-monitored probe into alleged regularities in the deal for procurement of the jets. It had also said that it was not their job to go into the issue of pricing of the fighter planes.

Rafale verdict Supreme Court dismisses petitions to review December 2018 verdict warns Rahul Gandhi not to drag court into political discourse

File image of a Rafale fighter jet. Wikimedia Commons

The Bench, comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SK Kaul and KM Joseph, rejected the contention that there was a need for registration of FIRs in connection with the deal.

Review petitions against the order passed last year were filed by former Union Ministers Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie, lawyer Prashant Bhushan and others, on the grounds that it contained several errors. They contended that the judgment relied upon patently incorrect claims made by the government in an unsigned note given in a sealed cover to the court. The petitioners also sought permission to take on record a document leaked from the Defence Ministry as evidence.

Follow LIVE Updates on Supreme Court hearings here

On 10 April, the Centre challenged the admissibility of the leaked documents and claimed privilege over them, asserted that the petitioners had procured them in an "illegal way". It further said that the documents were sensitive to national security and explained the Rafale’s war capacity. The Supreme Court, however, ruled that the documents be taken on record.

On 10 May, the last day before the court’s summer vacations, the bench had reserved orders on the review petitions.

A contempt petition filed by BJP leader Meenakshi Lekhi against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for wrongly attributing his ‘chowkidar chor hai’ slogan to the court was also dismissed. "Rahul Gandhi needs to be more careful in future," the court ruled.

"The Court cannot be dragged into a political discourse", observed Justice Kaul, who wrote the judgment for the bench.

Lekhi had accused Gandhi of misquoting the 10 April order of the apex court in which it had allowed additional leaked documents to be put on record as evidence in the Rafale case.

Gandhi, then chief of the Congress party, had said during a Lok Sabha election rally that the apex court had accepted that 'chowkidar' (a term with which he referred to Prime Minister Modi), is a ‘chor' (thief). He was issued a contempt notice by the apex court, with Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi maintain that Gandhi would either have to tender an apology or face criminal contempt proceedings.

Even though Gandhi tendered an unconditional apology, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, who represented Lekhi, had argued that Gandhi's apology should be rejected and action must be taken against him. "He (Gandhi) has only expressed regret. The law is clear in contempt cases that the line starts with an unconditional apology," he had submitted before the court.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Supreme Court upholds Centre's amnesty scheme on exotic birds and animals
India

Supreme Court upholds Centre's amnesty scheme on exotic birds and animals

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde has upheld an Allahabad High Court judgment in this regard.

2G scam case: Delhi HC says will hear CBI's appeal against acquittal of A Raja, others in Jan
India

2G scam case: Delhi HC says will hear CBI's appeal against acquittal of A Raja, others in Jan

Though the CBI had earlier concluded its submissions on the issue of leave to appeal, it will have to argue the matter afresh due to the judge being changed. Justice Brijesh Sethi retired on 30 November.

WhiteHat Jr gets respite from court against Pradeep Poonia who accused it of malpractices, misleading ads
Business

WhiteHat Jr gets respite from court against Pradeep Poonia who accused it of malpractices, misleading ads

The court order restricts Poonia from accessing WhiteHat Jr's internal communication channels or making any of its information public until 6 January.