The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to advocate Prashant Bhushan on the suo motu contempt proceeding against him, saying that the activist-lawyer “brought administration of justice into disrepute” and his tweets are “capable of undermining the dignity and authority of SC and office of CJI”, reports said. According to LiveLaw, the Supreme Court has also asked Bhushan to justify to the court “as to why contempt of court proceedings should not be initiated against him over his tweets on judiciary”.
SC says it prima facie is of the view that the two tweets by adv. #PrashantBhushan have brought disrepute to the administration of justice and could undermine, in the eyes of the public, the dignity and authority of the Supreme Court in general and the CJI’s office in particular. pic.twitter.com/tvEEM1gilk
— The Leaflet (@TheLeaflet_in) July 22, 2020
The allegedly contemptuous tweets were critical of the top court and posted by Bhushan on Twitter on 27 and 29 June. In one of the tweets, the advocate has criticised CJI SA Bobde. He had tweeted: “CJI rides a 50 Lakh motorcycle belonging to a BJP leader at Raj Bhavan Nagpur, without a mask or helmet, at a time when he keeps the SC in Lockdown mode denying citizens their fundamental right to access Justice! (sic)”
Bhushan has been raising issues pertaining to judiciary and recently he was very critical of the way in which the top court handled the matters related to migrant workers amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Bhushan had slammed the apex court, saying:
The bench, which asked the Attorney General to assist in the matter, posted the case for hearing on 5 August. According to news agency PTI, a bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra also observed that initially the contempt issue was placed before the administrative side of the apex court but it was directed to be listed on the judicial side. Twitter Inc made party to case, offers to remove tweets The apex court also directed that Twitter INC be made a party, instead of Twitter India, to the contempt proceedings it has initiated suo motu (on its own) and asked the US-based firm to file a response in the matter.


)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
