Plea in SC to debar those on trial for serious offences from contesting elections

Petitioner Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in the PIL said that out of 539 winners of the Lok Sabha election in 2019, as many as 233 (43 percent) declared criminal cases against themselves

Press Trust of India September 27, 2020 22:16:53 IST
Plea in SC to debar those on trial for serious offences from contesting elections

Supreme Court of India. PTI

New Delhi: A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court seeking to debar persons, against whom charges have been framed in serious offences, from contesting elections.

The PIL, which is likely to come up for hearing in the coming days, sought a direction to the Centre and the Election Commission of India (ECI) to take steps to debar people who are put on trial in cases of serious offences.

It claimed that despite recommendations of the Law Commission and the court's earlier directions, the Centre and the ECI have not taken steps in this regard.

Petitioner Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) said out of 539 winners of the Lok Sabha election in 2019, as many as 233 (43 percent) declared criminal cases against themselves.

The plea, filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey, added that there was an increase of 109 percent in the number of MPs with declared serious criminal cases since 2009, with one MP declaring 204 criminal cases against himself including cases related to committing culpable homicide, house trespass, robbery, criminal intimidation etc.

"What is alarming is that the percentage of candidates with criminal antecedents and their chances of winning have actually increased rapidly over the years," the petition said.

"Criminals who earlier used to help politicians win elections in the hope of getting favours, appear to have cut out the middle-man in favour of entering politics themselves and political parties in turn have become steadily more reliant on criminals as candidates 'self-finance' their own elections in an era, where election contests have become phenomenally expensive, but also because candidates with criminal antecedents are more likely to win than clean candidates," it alleged.

It further alleged that political parties are competing with each other in a race to the bottom because they cannot afford to leave their competitors free to recruit criminals.

"The injury caused to people is large because criminalisation of politics is at an extreme level and political parties are still setting-up candidates with serious criminal antecedents.Therefore, voters find it difficult to cast their vote freely and fairly though it is their fundamental right, guaranteed under Article 19," it said.

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

SC adjourns hearing after non-appearance of lawyer on PIL seeking court-monitored CBI probe in Disha Salian's death
India

SC adjourns hearing after non-appearance of lawyer on PIL seeking court-monitored CBI probe in Disha Salian's death

The Supreme Court, which was hearing a plea claiming both the deaths of Sushant Singh Rajput and his ex-manager Disha Salian are interconnected, adjourned the matter till after Dussehra holidays

SC seeks Centre's response on PIL to regulate content on streaming platforms by autonomous body
Entertainment

SC seeks Centre's response on PIL to regulate content on streaming platforms by autonomous body

A bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian issued notices to the central government, I&B Ministry, and Internet and Mobile Association of India for the creation of an autonomous body monitoring OTT content.

GOP-led Senate panel advances Amy Coney Barrett's SC nomination as Democrats boycott vote
World

GOP-led Senate panel advances Amy Coney Barrett's SC nomination as Democrats boycott vote

Instead of attending, the Democrats displayed posters at their desks of Americans they say have benefited from the Affordable Care Act, which is now being challenged in court