Obscene acts in private place not a criminal offence under IPC: Bombay High Court

Quashing a case against 13 men who were arrested for allegedly indulging in obscene acts, the Bombay High Court has said any such action done in a private place is not a criminal offence under the IPC

hidden March 20, 2016 11:30:03 IST
Obscene acts in private place not a criminal offence under IPC: Bombay High Court

Mumbai: Quashing a case against 13 men who were arrested for allegedly indulging in obscene acts with
women in a flat, the Bombay High Court has said any such action done in a private place is not a criminal offence under the Indian Penal Code.

Obscene acts in private place not a criminal offence under IPC Bombay High Court

File image of Bombay High Court. IBNLive

A division bench of Justices N H Patil and A M Badar was hearing a petition recently filed by the men seeking quashing of the FIR registered against them by Andheri Police in December last year under IPC section 294 (anyone indulging in an obscene act in any public place or sings or utters any obscene songs or words in any public place causing annoyance to others).

According to police, on 12 December, 2015, they received a complaint from a journalist about loud music emanating from a flat in the neighbourhood and that scantily dressed women were seen from the window dancing and men showering money at them.

On perusal of the complaint, the police raided the flat and found six scantily dressed women who were dancing and 13 men consuming liquor in the flat. All the men were taken into custody and an FIR was registered against them.

Petitioners' advocate Rajendra Shirodkar argued that the flat in question cannot be said to be a public place where anyone had access.

The court accepted this argument and said, "Obscene act done in a private place or viewed in privacy is not
covered by the provisions of section 294 of IPC. The flat in building owned by some private person meant for private use of such owner cannot be said to be a public place."

"Section 294 of IPC is meant for punishing persons indulging in obscene act in any public place causing
annoyance to others. As such, the places where such obscene act is committed needs to be a public place and meant for use of public at large.

"Public must have free access to such place so as to call it a public place. The place where public have no right rather a lawful right to enter into, cannot be said to be a public place for invoking the penal provisions of section 294 of IPC," the court said.

PTI

Updated Date:

Find latest and upcoming tech gadgets online on Tech2 Gadgets. Get technology news, gadgets reviews & ratings. Popular gadgets including laptop, tablet and mobile specifications, features, prices, comparison.

also read

Bombay HC stays two FIRs against Arnab Goswami over 'provocative remarks', says no prime facie evidence against him
India

Bombay HC stays two FIRs against Arnab Goswami over 'provocative remarks', says no prime facie evidence against him

Goswami was booked in two cases related to his alleged provocative remarks and defaming Congress interim chief Sonia Gandhi in a television debate

Elgar Parishad case: Bombay HC seeks response from NIA, Maharashtra govt on plea challenging transfer of probe to agency
India

Elgar Parishad case: Bombay HC seeks response from NIA, Maharashtra govt on plea challenging transfer of probe to agency

The petitioners Surendra Gadling and Sudhir Dhawale were arrested in June 2018 and are currently lodged at the Taloja jail in Navi Mumbai.