NV Ramana becomes third SC judge to recuse from hearing plea against M Nageswara Rao’s appointment as interim CBI director

Supreme Court judge NV Ramana recused himself from hearing a plea challenging the Centre's decision to appoint M Nageswara Rao as interim CBI Director

Press Trust of India January 31, 2019 12:29:14 IST
NV Ramana becomes third SC judge to recuse from hearing plea against M Nageswara Rao’s appointment as interim CBI director
  • Justice NV Ramana became the third SC judge to recuse himself from hearing the plea challenging M Nageswara Rao’s appointment

  • Justice Ramana said Rao is from his home state and attended his daughter’s wedding ceremony

  • He referred the matter to the CJI to list it before an appropriate bench

New Delhi: Supreme Court judge Justice NV Ramana on Thursday recused himself from hearing a plea challenging the Centre's decision to appoint M Nageswara Rao as interim CBI Director.

Justice Ramana became the third judge of the apex court to recuse himself from hearing the matter as Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi and the second senior-most judge in the court Justice AK Sikri had earlier recused themselves from adjudicating the case.

NV Ramana becomes third SC judge to recuse from hearing plea against M Nageswara Raos appointment as interim CBI director

File image of the Supreme Court. AP

NGO Common Cause has approached the top court challenging the Centre's decision to appoint Rao as the interim CBI director.

While recusing himself from hearing the matter, Justice Ramana said Rao is from his home state and he had attended the wedding ceremony of Rao's daughter. Justice Ramana referred the matter to the CJI to list it before an appropriate bench.

Justice Sikri, who had represented CJI Gogoi on the high-powered committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi that controversially removed Alok Verma as CBI director on 10 January, had not given any specific reason for withdrawing from hearing the case.

CJI Gogoi had recused himself from hearing the plea, saying he would be a part of the selection committee to choose the probe agency's new chief.

The NGO in its petition has sought specific mechanisms to ensure transparency in the process of appointing the CBI director. It has alleged that Rao's appointment was not made on the basis of recommendations of the high-powered selection committee.

According to the plea, the 23 October order appointing Rao interim CBI director was quashed by the top court on 8 January but the government "acted in a completely mala fide, arbitrary and illegal manner" to appoint him again in "complete contravention" of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act.

On 10 January, Rao, additional director in CBI, was made interim chief till the appointment of a new director, after the removal of Verma. The plea has sought a direction to the Centre to appoint a regular CBI director forthwith.

It has also sought an immediate direction to the government to ensure that "all records" of deliberations and rational criteria related to short-listing and selection of the CBI director be properly recorded and made available to citizens in consonance with the provisions of the RTI Act.

Updated Date:

also read

Supreme Court puts sedition law on hold: A look back at cases that shook the nation
India

Supreme Court puts sedition law on hold: A look back at cases that shook the nation

The colonial-era sedition law has been invoked against the likes of author Arundhati Roy, student leaders Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, and cartoonist Aseem Trivedi among others

As SC puts on hold application of sedition law, Kiren Rijiju talks of Lakshman Rekha
India

As SC puts on hold application of sedition law, Kiren Rijiju talks of Lakshman Rekha

In its significant order on the law that has been under intense public scrutiny, a bench headed by Chief Justice NV Ramana said there was a need to balance the interest of civil liberties and interests of citizens with that of the State

Minority tag for Hindus? Supreme Court to hear matter today
Politics

Minority tag for Hindus? Supreme Court to hear matter today

SC has asked Centre to respond to a plea, which has sought directions for framing guidelines for the identification of minorities at the state level, contending that Hindus are in minority in 10 states